Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userPractical Perspectives on Quality Estimation for Machine Translation
96
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Junpei Zhou
Publication date
2020
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Sentence level quality estimation (QE) for machine translation (MT) attempts to predict the translation edit rate (TER) cost of post-editing work required to correct MT output. We describe our view on sentence-level QE as dictated by several practical setups encountered in the industry. We find consumers of MT output---whether human or algorithmic ones---to be primarily interested in a binary quality metric: is the translated sentence adequate as-is or does it need post-editing? Motivated by this we propose a quality classification (QC) view on sentence-level QE whereby we focus on maximizing recall at precision above a given threshold. We demonstrate that, while classical QE regression models fare poorly on this task, they can be re-purposed by replacing the output regression layer with a binary classification one, achieving 50-60% recall at 90% precision. For a high-quality MT system producing 75-80% correct translations, this promises a significant reduction in post-editing work indeed.
rate research
Read More
Machine Translation Quality Estimation (QE) is a task of predicting the quality of machine translations without relying on any reference. Recently, the predictor-estimator framework trains the predictor as a feature extractor, which leverages the extra parallel corpora without QE labels, achieving promising QE performance. However, we argue that there are gaps between the predictor and the estimator in both data quality and training objectives, which preclude QE models from benefiting from a large number of parallel corpora more directly. We propose a novel framework called DirectQE that provides a direct pretraining for QE tasks. In DirectQE, a generator is trained to produce pseudo data that is closer to the real QE data, and a detector is pretrained on these data with novel objectives that are akin to the QE task. Experiments on widely used benchmarks show that DirectQE outperforms existing methods, without using any pretraining models such as BERT. We also give extensive analyses showing how fixing the two gaps contributes to our improvements.
Quality Estimation (QE) plays an essential role in applications of Machine Translation (MT). Traditionally, a QE system accepts the original source text and translation from a black-box MT system as input. Recently, a few studies indicate that as a by-product of translation, QE benefits from the model and training datas information of the MT system where the translations come from, and it is called the glass-box QE. In this paper, we extend the definition of glass-box QE generally to uncertainty quantification with both black-box and glass-box approaches and design several features deduced from them to blaze a new trial in improving QEs performance. We propose a framework to fuse the feature engineering of uncertainty quantification into a pre-trained cross-lingual language model to predict the translation quality. Experiment results show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performances on the datasets of WMT 2020 QE shared task.
We introduce ChrEnTranslate, an online machine translation demonstration system for translation between English and an endangered language Cherokee. It supports both statistical and neural translation models as well as provides quality estimation to inform users of reliability, two user feedback interfaces for experts and common users respectively, example inputs to collect human translations for monolingual data, word alignment visualization, and relevant terms from the Cherokee-English dictionary. The quantitative evaluation demonstrates that our backbone translation models achieve state-of-the-art translation performance and our quality estimation well correlates with both BLEU and human judgment. By analyzing 216 pieces of expert feedback, we find that NMT is preferable because it copies less than SMT, and, in general, current models can translate fragments of the source sentence but make major mistakes. When we add these 216 expert-corrected parallel texts back into the training set and retrain models, equal or slightly better performance is observed, which indicates the potential of human-in-the-loop learning. Our online demo is at https://chren.cs.unc.edu/ , our code is open-sourced at https://github.com/ZhangShiyue/ChrEnTranslate , and our data is available at https://github.com/ZhangShiyue/ChrEn
Automatic machine translation is super efficient to produce translations yet their quality is not guaranteed. This technique report introduces TranSmart, a practical human-machine interactive translation system that is able to trade off translation quality and efficiency. Compared to existing publicly available interactive translation systems, TranSmart supports three key features, word-level autocompletion, sentence-level autocompletion and translation memory. By word-level and sentence-level autocompletion, TranSmart allows users to interactively translate words in their own manners rather than the strict manner from left to right. In addition, TranSmart has the potential to avoid similar translation mistakes by using translated sentences in history as its memory. This report presents major functions of TranSmart, algorithms for achieving these functions, how to use the TranSmart APIs, and evaluation results of some key functions. TranSmart is publicly available at its homepage (https://transmart.qq.com).
Recent advances in AI and ML applications have benefited from rapid progress in NLP research. Leaderboards have emerged as a popular mechanism to track and accelerate progress in NLP through competitive model development. While this has increased interest and participation, the over-reliance on single, and accuracy-based metrics have shifted focus from other important metrics that might be equally pertinent to consider in real-world contexts. In this paper, we offer a preliminary discussion of the risks associated with focusing exclusively on accuracy metrics and draw on recent discussions to highlight prescriptive suggestions on how to develop more practical and effective leaderboards that can better reflect the real-world utility of models.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
