Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userA Formal Causal Interpretation of the Case-Crossover Design
299
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Zachary Shahn
Publication date
2020
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The case-crossover design (Maclure, 1991) is widely used in epidemiology and other fields to study causal effects of transient treatments on acute outcomes. However, its validity and causal interpretation have only been justified under informal conditions. Here, we place the design in a formal counterfactual framework for the first time. Doing so helps to clarify its assumptions and interpretation. In particular, when the treatment effect is non-null, we identify a previously unnoticed bias arising from common causes of the outcome at different person-times. We analytically characterize the direction and size of this bias and demonstrate its potential importance with a simulation. We also use our derivation of the limit of the case-crossover estimator to analyze its sensitivity to treatment effect heterogeneity, a violation of one of the informal criteria for validity. The upshot of this work for practitioners is that, while the case-crossover design can be useful for testing the causal null hypothesis in the presence of baseline confounders, extra caution is warranted when using the case-crossover design for point estimation of causal effects.
rate research
Read More
An important step for any causal inference study design is understanding the distribution of the treated and control subjects in terms of measured baseline covariates. However, not all baseline variation is equally important. In the observational context, balancing on baseline variation summarized in a propensity score can help reduce bias due to self-selection. In both observational and experimental studies, controlling baseline variation associated with the expected outcomes can help increase the precision of causal effect estimates. We propose a set of visualizations which decompose the space of measured covariates into the different types of baseline variation important to the study design. These ``assignment-control plots and variations thereof visually illustrate core concepts of causal inference and suggest new directions for methodological research on study design. As a practical demonstration, we illustrate one application of assignment-control plots to a study of cardiothoracic surgery. While the family of visualization tools for studies of causality is relatively sparse, simple visual tools can be an asset to education, application, and methods development.
Inferring the causal structure of a system typically requires interventional data, rather than just observational data. Since interventional experiments can be costly, it is preferable to select interventions that yield the maximum amount of information about a system. We propose a novel Bayesian method for optimal experimental design by sequentially selecting interventions that minimize the expected posterior entropy as rapidly as possible. A key feature is that the method can be implemented by computing simple summaries of the current posterior, avoiding the computationally burdensome task of repeatedly performing posterior inference on hypothetical future datasets drawn from the posterior predictive. After deriving the method in a general setting, we apply it to the problem of inferring causal networks. We present a series of simulation studies in which we find that the proposed method performs favorably compared to existing alternative methods. Finally, we apply the method to real and simulated data from a protein-signaling network.
The use of case-crossover designs has become widespread in epidemiological and medical investigations of transient associations. However, the most popular reference-select strategy, the time-stratified schema, is not a suitable solution for controlling bias in case-crossover studies. To prove this, we conducted a time series decomposition for daily ozone (O3) records; scrutinized the ability of the time-stratified schema on controlling the yearly, monthly and weekly time trends; and found it failed on controlling the weekly time trend. Based on this finding, we proposed a new logistic regression approach in which we did adjustment for the weekly time trend. A comparison between the traditional model and the proposed method was done by simulation. An empirical study was conducted to explore potential associations between air pollutants and AMI hospitalizations. In summary, time-stratified schema provide effective control on yearly and monthly time trends but not on weekly time trend. Therefore, the estimation from the traditional logistical regression basically reveals the effect of weekly time trend, instead of the transient effect. In contrast, the proposed logistic regression with adjustment for weekly time trend can effectively eliminate system bias in case-crossover studies.
We consider the problem of predicting a response $Y$ from a set of covariates $X$ when test and training distributions differ. Since such differences may have causal explanations, we consider test distributions that emerge from interventions in a structural causal model, and focus on minimizing the worst-case risk. Causal regression models, which regress the response on its direct causes, remain unchanged under arbitrary interventions on the covariates, but they are not always optimal in the above sense. For example, for linear models and bounded interventions, alternative solutions have been shown to be minimax prediction optimal. We introduce the formal framework of distribution generalization that allows us to analyze the above problem in partially observed nonlinear models for both direct interventions on $X$ and interventions that occur indirectly via exogenous variables $A$. It takes into account that, in practice, minimax solutions need to be identified from data. Our framework allows us to characterize under which class of interventions the causal function is minimax optimal. We prove sufficient conditions for distribution generalization and present corresponding impossibility results. We propose a practical method, NILE, that achieves distribution generalization in a nonlinear IV setting with linear extrapolation. We prove consistency and present empirical results.
The notion of exchangeability has been recognized in the causal inference literature in various guises, but only rarely in the original Bayesian meaning as a symmetry property between individual units in statistical inference. Since the latter is a standard ingredient in Bayesian inference, we argue that in Bayesian causal inference it is natural to link the causal model, including the notion of confounding and definition of causal contrasts of interest, to the concept of exchangeability. Here we relate the Bayesian notion of exchangeability to alternative conditions for unconfounded inferences, commonly stated using potential outcomes, and define causal contrasts in the presence of exchangeability in terms of limits of posterior predictive expectations for further exchangeable units. While our main focus is in a point treatment setting, we also investigate how this reasoning carries over to longitudinal settings.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
