Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) is a powerful characterization technique to readily image and manipulate ferroelectrics domains. PFM gives insight into the strength of local piezoelectric coupling as well as polarization direction through PFM amplitude and phase, respectively. Converting measured arbitrary units to physical material parameters, however, remains a challenge. While much effort has been spent on quantifying the PFM amplitude signal, little attention has been given to the PFM phase and it is often arbitrarily adjusted to fit expectations or processed as recorded. This is problematic when investigating materials with unknown or potentially negative sign of the probed effective electrostrictive coefficient or strong frequency dispersion of electromechanical responses since assumptions about the phase cannot be reliably made. The PFM phase can, however, provide important information on the polarization orientation and the sign of the electrostrictive coefficient. Most notably, the orientation of the PFM hysteresis loop is determined by the PFM phase. Moreover, when presenting PFM data as a combined signal, the resulting response can be artificially lowered or asymmetric if the phase data has not been correctly processed. Here, we demonstrate a path to identify the phase offset required to extract correct meaning from PFM phase data. We explore different sources of phase offsets including the experimental setup, instrumental contributions, and data analysis. We discuss the physical working principles of PFM and develop a strategy to extract physical meaning from the PFM phase. The proposed procedures are verified on two materials with positive and negative piezoelectric coefficients.
Download