Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userEstimation of Conditional Average Treatment Effects with High-Dimensional Data
159
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Given the unconfoundedness assumption, we propose new nonparametric estimators for the reduced dimensional conditional average treatment effect (CATE) function. In the first stage, the nuisance functions necessary for identifying CATE are estimated by machine learning methods, allowing the number of covariates to be comparable to or larger than the sample size. The second stage consists of a low-dimensional local linear regression, reducing CATE to a function of the covariate(s) of interest. We consider two variants of the estimator depending on whether the nuisance functions are estimated over the full sample or over a hold-out sample. Building on Belloni at al. (2017) and Chernozhukov et al. (2018), we derive functional limit theory for the estimators and provide an easy-to-implement procedure for uniform inference based on the multiplier bootstrap. The empirical application revisits the effect of maternal smoking on a babys birth weight as a function of the mothers age.
rate research
Read More
Unobserved heterogeneous treatment effects have been emphasized in the recent policy evaluation literature (see e.g., Heckman and Vytlacil, 2005). This paper proposes a nonparametric test for unobserved heterogeneous treatment effects in a treatment effect model with a binary treatment assignment, allowing for individuals self-selection to the treatment. Under the standard local average treatment effects assumptions, i.e., the no defiers condition, we derive testable model restrictions for the hypothesis of unobserved heterogeneous treatment effects. Also, we show that if the treatment outcomes satisfy a monotonicity assumption, these model restrictions are also sufficient. Then, we propose a modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov-type test which is consistent and simple to implement. Monte Carlo simulations show that our test performs well in finite samples. For illustration, we apply our test to study heterogeneous treatment effects of the Job Training Partnership Act on earnings and the impacts of fertility on family income, where the null hypothesis of homogeneous treatment effects gets rejected in the second case but fails to be rejected in the first application.
We consider the setting in which a strong binary instrument is available for a binary treatment. The traditional LATE approach assumes the monotonicity condition stating that there are no defiers (or compliers). Since this condition is not always obvious, we investigate the sensitivity and testability of this condition. In particular, we focus on the question: does a slight violation of monotonicity lead to a small problem or a big problem? We find a phase transition for the monotonicity condition. On one of the boundary of the phase transition, it is easy to learn the sign of LATE and on the other side of the boundary, it is impossible to learn the sign of LATE. Unfortunately, the impossible side of the phase transition includes data-generating processes under which the proportion of defiers tends to zero. This boundary of phase transition is explicitly characterized in the case of binary outcomes. Outside a special case, it is impossible to test whether the data-generating process is on the nice side of the boundary. However, in the special case that the non-compliance is almost one-sided, such a test is possible. We also provide simple alternatives to monotonicity.
The policy relevant treatment effect (PRTE) measures the average effect of switching from a status-quo policy to a counterfactual policy. Estimation of the PRTE involves estimation of multiple preliminary parameters, including propensity scores, conditional expectation functions of the outcome and covariates given the propensity score, and marginal treatment effects. These preliminary estimators can affect the asymptotic distribution of the PRTE estimator in complicated and intractable manners. In this light, we propose an orthogonal score for double debiased estimation of the PRTE, whereby the asymptotic distribution of the PRTE estimator is obtained without any influence of preliminary parameter estimators as far as they satisfy mild requirements of convergence rates. To our knowledge, this paper is the first to develop limit distribution theories for inference about the PRTE.
Datasets from field experiments with covariate-adaptive randomizations (CARs) usually contain extra baseline covariates in addition to the strata indicators. We propose to incorporate these extra covariates via auxiliary regressions in the estimation and inference of unconditional QTEs under CARs. We establish the consistency, limiting distribution, and validity of the multiplier bootstrap of the regression-adjusted QTE estimator. The auxiliary regression may be estimated parametrically, nonparametrically, or via regularization when the data are high-dimensional. Even when the auxiliary regression is misspecified, the proposed bootstrap inferential procedure still achieves the nominal rejection probability in the limit under the null. When the auxiliary regression is correctly specified, the regression-adjusted estimator achieves the minimum asymptotic variance. We also derive the optimal pseudo true values for the potentially misspecified parametric model that minimize the asymptotic variance of the corresponding QTE estimator. We demonstrate the finite sample performance of the new estimation and inferential methods using simulations and provide an empirical application to a well-known dataset in education.
This paper studies the instrument identification power for the average treatment effect (ATE) in partially identified binary outcome models with an endogenous binary treatment. We propose a novel approach to measure the instrument identification power by their ability to reduce the width of the ATE bounds. We show that instrument strength, as determined by the extreme values of the conditional propensity score, and its interplays with the degree of endogeneity and the exogenous covariates all play a role in bounding the ATE. We decompose the ATE identification gains into a sequence of measurable components, and construct a standardized quantitative measure for the instrument identification power ($IIP$). The decomposition and the $IIP$ evaluation are illustrated with finite-sample simulation studies and an empirical example of childbearing and womens labor supply. Our simulations show that the $IIP$ is a useful tool for detecting irrelevant instruments.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
