Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userGamma-ray burst jet propagation, development of angular structure, and the luminosity function
66
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The fate and observable properties of gamma-ray burst jets depend crucially on their interaction with the progenitor material that surrounds the central engine. We present a semi-analytical model of such interaction, which builds upon several previous analytical and numerical works, aimed at predicting the angular distribution of jet and cocoon energy and Lorentz factor after breakout, given the properties of the ambient material and of the jet at launch. Using this model, we construct synthetic populations of structured jets, assuming either a collapsar (for long gamma-ray bursts -- LGRBs) or a binary neutron star merger (for short gamma-ray bursts -- SGRBs) as progenitor. We assume all progenitors to be identical, and we allow little variability in the jet properties at launch: our populations therefore feature a quasi-universal structure. These populations are able to reproduce the main features of the observed LGRB and SGRB luminosity functions, although several uncertainties and caveats remain to be addressed.
rate research
Read More
The structure of Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) jets impacts on their prompt and afterglow emission properties. The jet of GRBs could be uniform, with constant energy per unit solid angle within the jet aperture, or it could instead be structured, namely with energy and velocity that depend on the angular distance from the axis of the jet. We try to get some insight about the still unknown structure of GRBs by studying their luminosity function. We show that low (1e46-1e48 erg/s) and high (i.e. with L > 1e50 erg/s) luminosity GRBs can be described by a unique luminosity function, which is also consistent with current lower limits in the intermediate luminosity range (1e48-1e50} erg/s). We derive analytical expressions for the luminosity function of GRBs in uniform and structured jet models and compare them with the data. Uniform jets can reproduce the entire luminosity function with reasonable values of the free parameters. A structured jet can also fit adequately the current data, provided that the energy within the jet is relatively strongly structured, i.e. E propto theta^{-k} with k > 4. The classical E propto theta^{-2} structured jet model is excluded by the current data.
A structured gamma-ray burst jet could explain the dimness of the prompt emission observed from GRB$,170817$A but the exact form of this structure is still ambiguous. However, with the promise of future joint gravitational wave and gamma-ray burst observations, we shall be able to examine populations of binary neutron star mergers rather than a case-by-case basis. We present an analysis that considers gravitational wave triggered binary neutron star events both with and without short gamma-ray burst counterparts assuming that events without a counterpart were observed off-axis. This allows for Bayes factors to be calculated to compare different jet structure models. We perform model comparison between a Gaussian and power-law apparent jet structure on simulated data to demonstrate that the correct model can be distinguished with a log Bayes factor of $>5$ after less than 100 events. Constraints on the apparent structure jet model parameters are also made. After 25(100) events the angular width of the core of a power-law jet structure can be constrained within a $90%$ credible interval of width $ sim9.1(4.4)^{circ} $, and the outer beaming angle to be within $sim19.9(8.5)^{circ}$. Similarly we show the width of a Gaussian jet structure to be constrained to $sim2.8(1.6)^{circ}$.
The observed association between supernovae and gamma-ray bursts represents a cornerstone in our understanding of the nature of gamma-ray bursts. The collapsar model provides a theoretical framework for this connection. A key element is the launch of a bi-polar jet (seen as a gamma-ray burst). The resulting hot cocoon disrupts the star while the 56Ni produced gives rise to radioactive heating of the ejecta, seen as a supernova. In this discussion paper I summarise the observational status of the supernova/gamma-ray burst connection in the context of the engine picture of jet-driven supernovae and highlight SN 2012bz/GRB 120422A -- with its luminous supernova but intermediate high-energy luminosity -- as a possible transition object between low-luminosity and jet gamma-ray bursts. The jet channel for supernova explosions may provide new insight into supernova explosions in general.
Gamma-ray Burst (GRB) collimation has been inferred with the observations of achromatic steepening in GRB light curves, known as jet breaks. Identifying a jet break from a GRB afterglow lightcurve allows a measurement of the jet opening angle and true energetics of GRBs. In this paper, we reinvestigate this problem using a large sample of GRBs that have an optical jet break which is consistent with being achromatic in the X-ray band. Our sample includes 99 GRBs from February 1997 to March 2015 that have optical and, for Swift GRBs, X-ray lightcurves that are consistent with the jet break interpretation. Out of 99 GRBs we have studied, 55 GRBs are found to have temporal and spectral behaviors both before and after the break consistent with the theoretical predictions of the jet break models, respectively. These include 53 long/soft (Type II) and 2 short/hard (Type I) GRBs. Only 1 GRB is classified as the candidate of a jet break with energy injection. Another 41 and 3 GRBs are classified as the candidates with the lower and upper limits of the jet break time, respectively. The typical beaming correction factor $f_b^{-1} sim 1000$ for Type II GRBs, suggesting an even higher total GRB event rate density in the universe. Both isotropic and jet-corrected energies have a wide span in their distributions. We also investigate several empirical correlations (Amati, Frail, Ghirlanda and Liang-Zhang) previously discussed in the literature. We find that in general most of these relations are less tight than before. The existence of early jet breaks and hence small opening angle jets, which were detected in the {em Swfit era}, is most likely the source of scatter. If one limits the sample to jet breaks later than $10^4$ s, the Liang-Zhang relation remains tight and the Ghirlanda relation still exists. These relations are derived from Type II GRBs, and Type I GRBs usually deviate from them.
Relations linking the temporal or/and spectral properties of the prompt emission of gamma-ray bursts (hereafter GRBs) to the absolute luminosity are of great importance as they both constrain the radiation mechanisms and represent potential distance indicators. Here we discuss two such relations: the lag-luminosity relation and the newly discovered duration-luminosity relation of GRB pulses. We aim to extend our previous work on the origin of spectral lags, using the duration-luminosity relation recently discovered by Hakkila et al. to connect lags and luminosity. We also present a way to test this relation which has originally been established with a limited sample of only 12 pulses. We relate lags to the spectral evolution and shape of the pulses with a linear expansion of the pulse properties around maximum. We then couple this first result to the duration-luminosity relation to obtain the lag-luminosity and lag-duration relations. We finally use a Monte-Carlo method to generate a population of synthetic GRB pulses which is then used to check the validity of the duration-luminosity relation. Our theoretical results for the lag and duration-luminosity relations are in good agreement with the data. They are rather insensitive to the assumptions regarding the burst spectral parameters. Our Monte Carlo analysis of a population of synthetic pulses confirms that the duration-luminosity relation must be satisfied to reproduce the observational duration-peak flux diagram of BATSE GRB pulses. The newly discovered duration-luminosity relation offers the possibility to link all three quantities: lag, duration and luminosity of GRB pulses in a consistent way. Some evidence for its validity have been presented but its origin is not easy to explain in the context of the internal shock model.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
