Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userUnderstanding Goal-Oriented Active Learning via Influence Functions
183
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Active learning (AL) concerns itself with learning a model from as few labelled data as possible through actively and iteratively querying an oracle with selected unlabelled samples. In this paper, we focus on analyzing a popular type of AL in which the utility of a sample is measured by a specified goal achieved by the retrained model after accounting for the samples marginal influence. Such AL strategies attract a lot of attention thanks to their intuitive motivations, yet they also suffer from impractically high computational costs due to their need for many iterations of model retraining. With the help of influence functions, we present an effective approximation that bypasses model retraining altogether, and propose a general efficient implementation that makes such AL strategies applicable in practice, both in the serial and the more challenging batch-mode setting. Additionally, we present both theoretical and empirical findings which call into question a few common practices and beliefs about such AL strategies.
rate research
Read More
Compact neural networks are essential for affordable and power efficient deep learning solutions. Binary Neural Networks (BNNs) take compactification to the extreme by constraining both weights and activations to two levels, ${+1, -1}$. However, training BNNs are not easy due to the discontinuity in activation functions, and the training dynamics of BNNs is not well understood. In this paper, we present an information-theoretic perspective of BNN training. We analyze BNNs through the Information Bottleneck principle and observe that the training dynamics of BNNs is considerably different from that of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). While DNNs have a separate empirical risk minimization and representation compression phases, our numerical experiments show that in BNNs, both these phases are simultaneous. Since BNNs have a less expressive capacity, they tend to find efficient hidden representations concurrently with label fitting. Experiments in multiple datasets support these observations, and we see a consistent behavior across different activation functions in BNNs.
The existing active learning methods select the samples by evaluating the samples uncertainty or its effect on the diversity of labeled datasets based on different task-specific or model-specific criteria. In this paper, we propose the Influence Selection for Active Learning(ISAL) which selects the unlabeled samples that can provide the most positive Influence on model performance. To obtain the Influence of the unlabeled sample in the active learning scenario, we design the Untrained Unlabeled sample Influence Calculation(UUIC) to estimate the unlabeled samples expected gradient with which we calculate its Influence. To prove the effectiveness of UUIC, we provide both theoretical and experimental analyses. Since the UUIC just depends on the model gradients, which can be obtained easily from any neural network, our active learning algorithm is task-agnostic and model-agnostic. ISAL achieves state-of-the-art performance in different active learning settings for different tasks with different datasets. Compared with previous methods, our method decreases the annotation cost at least by 12%, 13% and 16% on CIFAR10, VOC2012 and COCO, respectively.
What is the difference between goal-directed and habitual behavior? We propose a novel computational framework of decision making with Bayesian inference, in which everything is integrated as an entire neural network model. The model learns to predict environmental state transitions by self-exploration and generating motor actions by sampling stochastic internal states ${z}$. Habitual behavior, which is obtained from the prior distribution of ${z}$, is acquired by reinforcement learning. Goal-directed behavior is determined from the posterior distribution of ${z}$ by planning, using active inference which optimizes the past, current and future ${z}$ by minimizing the variational free energy for the desired future observation constrained by the observed sensory sequence. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework by experiments in a sensorimotor navigation task with camera observations and continuous motor actions.
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for prediction tasks like node classification or edge prediction have received increasing attention in recent machine learning from graphically structured data. However, a large quantity of labeled graphs is difficult to obtain, which significantly limits the true success of GNNs. Although active learning has been widely studied for addressing label-sparse issues with other data types like text, images, etc., how to make it effective over graphs is an open question for research. In this paper, we present an investigation on active learning with GNNs for node classification tasks. Specifically, we propose a new method, which uses node feature propagation followed by K-Medoids clustering of the nodes for instance selection in active learning. With a theoretical bound analysis we justify the design choice of our approach. In our experiments on four benchmark datasets, the proposed method outperforms other representative baseline methods consistently and significantly.
This work considers two distinct settings: imitation learning and goal-conditioned reinforcement learning. In either case, effective solutions require the agent to reliably reach a specified state (a goal), or set of states (a demonstration). Drawing a connection between probabilistic long-term dynamics and the desired value function, this work introduces an approach which utilizes recent advances in density estimation to effectively learn to reach a given state. As our first contribution, we use this approach for goal-conditioned reinforcement learning and show that it is both efficient and does not suffer from hindsight bias in stochastic domains. As our second contribution, we extend the approach to imitation learning and show that it achieves state-of-the art demonstration sample-efficiency on standard benchmark tasks.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
