No Arabic abstract
Sophisticated atmospheric retrieval algorithms, such as Nested Sampling, explore large parameter spaces by iterating over millions of radiative transfer (RT) calculations. Probability distribution functions for retrieved parameters are highly sensitive to assumptions made within the RT forward model. One key difference between RT models is the computation of the gaseous absorption throughout the atmosphere. We compare two methods of calculating gaseous absorption, cross-sections and correlated-$k$, by examining their resulting spectra of a number of typical ce{H2}-He dominated exoplanetary and brown dwarf atmospheres. We also consider the effects of including ce{H2}-He pressure-broadening in some of these examples. We use NEMESIS to compute forward models. Our $k$-tables are verified by comparison to ExoMol cross-sections provided online and a line-by-line calculation. For test cases with typical resolutions ($Delta u = 1$cm$^{-1}$), we show that the cross-section method overestimates the amount of absorption present in the atmosphere and should be used with caution. For mixed-gas atmospheres the morphology of the spectra changes, producing `ghost features. The two methods produce differences in flux of up to a few orders of magnitude. The addition of pressure broadening of lines adds up to an additional order of magnitude change in flux. These effects are more pronounced for brown dwarfs and secondary eclipse geometries. We note that correlated-$k$ can produce similar results to very high-resolution cross-sections, but is much less computationally expensive. We conclude that inaccurate use of cross-sections and omission of pressure broadening can be key sources of error in the modelling of brown dwarf and exoplanet atmospheres.
The study of the composition of brown dwarf atmospheres helped to understand their formation and evolution. Similarly, the study of exoplanet atmospheres is expected to constrain their formation and evolutionary states. We use results from 3D simulations, kinetic cloud formation and kinetic ion-neutral chemistry to investigate ionisation processes which will affect their atmosphere chemistry: The dayside of super-hot Jupiters is dominated by atomic hydrogen, and not H$_2$O. Such planetary atmospheres exhibit a substantial degree of thermal ionisation and clouds only form on the nightside where lightning leaves chemical tracers (e.g. HCN) for possibly long enough to be detectable. External radiation may cause exoplanets to be enshrouded in a shell of highly ionised, H$_3^+$-forming gas and a weather-driven aurora may emerge. Brown dwarfs enable us to study the role of electron beams for the emergence of an extrasolar, weather-system driven aurora-like chemistry, and the effect of strong magnetic fields on cold atmospheric gases. Electron beams trigger the formation of H$_3^+$ in the upper atmosphere of a brown dwarf (e.g. LSR-J1835) which may react with it to form hydronium, H$_3$O$^+$, as a longer lived chemical tracer. Brown dwarfs and super-hot gas giants may be excellent candidates to search for H$_3$O$^+$ as an H$_3^+$ product.
Today, we know ~4330 exoplanets orbiting their host stars in ~3200 planetary systems. The diversity of these exoplanets is large, and none of the known exoplanets is a twin to any of the solar system planets, nor is any of the known extrasolar planetary systems a twin of the solar system. Such diversity on many scales and structural levels requires fundamental theoretical approaches. Large efforts are underway to develop individual aspects of exoplanet sciences, like exoplanet atmospheres, cloud formation, disk chemistry, planet system dynamics, mantle convection, mass loss of planetary atmospheres. The following challenges need to be addressed in tandem with observational efforts. They provide the opportunity to progress our understanding of exoplanets and their atmospheres by exploring our models as virtual laboratories to fill gaps in observational data from different instruments and missions, and taken at different instances of times: Challenge a) Building complex models based on theoretical rigour that aim to understand the interactions of atmospheric processes, to treat cloud formation and its feedback onto the gas-phase chemistry and the energy budget of the planetary atmosphere moving away from solar-system inspired parameterisations. Challenge b) Enabling cloud modelling based on fundamental physio-chemical insights in order to be applicable to the large and unexplored chemical, radiative and thermodynamical parameter range of exoplanets in the universe. Challenge b) will be explored in this chapter of the book ExoFrontiers.
We describe the incorporation of polarized radiative transfer into the atmospheric radiative transfer modelling code VSTAR (Versatile Software for Transfer of Atmospheric Radiation). Using a vector discrete-ordinate radiative transfer code we are able to generate maps of radiance and polarization across the disc of a planet, and integrate over these to get the full-disc polarization. In this way we are able to obtain disc-resolved, phase-resolved and spectrally-resolved intensity and polarization for any of the wide range of atmopsheres that can be modelled with VSTAR. We have tested the code by reproducing a standard benchmark problem, as well as by comparing with classic calculations of the polarization phase curves of Venus. We apply the code to modelling the polarization phase curves of the hot Jupiter system HD 189733b. We find that the highest polarization amplitudes are produced with optically thick Rayleigh scattering clouds and these would result in a polarization amplitude of 27 ppm for the planetary signal seen in the combined light of the star and planet. A more realistic cloud model consistent with the observed transmission spectrum results is an amplitude of ~20 ppm. Decreasing the optical depth of the cloud, or making the cloud particles more absorbing, both have the effect of increasing the polarization of the reflected light but reducing the amount of reflected light and hence the observed polarization amplitude.
We review several aspects of the calculation of exoplanet model atmospheres in the current era, with a focus on understanding the temperature-pressure profiles of atmospheres and their emitted spectra. Most of the focus is on gas giant planets, both under strong stellar irradiation and in isolation. The roles of stellar irradiation, metallicity, surface gravity, C/O ratio, interior fluxes, and cloud opacity are discussed. Connections are made to the well-studied atmospheres of brown dwarfs as well as sub-Neptunes and terrestrial planets, where appropriate. Illustrative examples of model atmosphere retrievals on a thermal emission spectrum are given and connections are made between atmospheric abundances and the predictions of planet formation models.
Many stars, active galactic nuclei, accretion discs etc. are affected by the stochastic variations of temperature, turbulent gas motions, magnetic fields, number densities of atoms and dust grains. These stochastic variations influence on the extinction factors, Doppler widths of lines and so on. The presence of many reasons for fluctuations gives rise to Gaussian distribution of fluctuations. The usual models leave out of account the fluctuations. In many cases the consideration of fluctuations improves the coincidence of theoretical values with the observed data. The objective of this paper is the investigation of the influence of the number density fluctuations on the form of radiative transfer equations. We consider non-magnetized atmosphere in continuum.