Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userEvidence of two spectral breaks in the prompt emission of gamma ray bursts
68
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Maria Edvige Ravasio
Publication date
2019
fields
Physics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The long-lasting tension between the observed spectra of gamma ray bursts (GRBs) and the predicted synchrotron emission spectrum might be solved if electrons do not completely cool. Evidence for incomplete cooling was recently found in Swift GRBs with prompt observations down to 0.1 keV and in one bright Fermi burst, GRB 160625B. Here we systematically search for evidence of incomplete cooling in the spectra of the ten brightest short and long GRBs observed by Fermi. We find that in 8/10 long GRBs there is compelling evidence of a low energy break (below the peak energy) and good agreement with the photon indices of the synchrotron spectrum (respectively -2/3 and -3/2 below the break and between the break and the peak energy). Interestingly, none of the ten short GRBs analysed shows a break but the low energy spectral slope is consistent with -2/3. In a standard scenario, these results imply a very low magnetic field in the emission region (B ~ 10 G in the comoving frame), at odd with expectations.
rate research
Read More
A Thesis Submitted to the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics (supervisor: Prof. A. R. Rao)
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) were first detected thanks to their prompt emission, which was the only information available for decades. In 2010, while the high-energy prompt emission remains the main tool for the detection and the first localization of GRB sources, our understanding of this crucial phase of GRBs has made great progress. We discuss some recent advances in this field, like the occasional detection of the prompt emission at all wavelengths, from optical to GeV; the existence of sub-luminous GRBs; the attempts to standardize GRBs; and the possible detection of polarization in two very bright GRBs. Despite these advances, tantalizing observational and theoretical challenges still exist, concerning the detection of the faintest GRBs, the panchromatic observation of GRBs from their very beginning, the origin of the prompt emission, or the understanding of the physics at work during this phase. Significant progress on this last topic is expected with SVOM thanks to the observation of dozens of GRBs from optical to MeV during the burst itself, and the measure of the redshift for the majority of them. SVOM will also change our view of the prompt GRB phase in another way. Within a few years, the sensitivity of sky surveys at optical and radio frequencies, and outside the electromagnetic domain in gravitational waves or neutrinos, will allow them to detect several new types of transient signals, and SVOM will be uniquely suited to identify which of these transients are associated with GRBs. This radically novel look at GRBs may elucidate the complex physics producing these bright flashes.
GRB spectra appear non-thermal, but recent observations of a few bursts with Fermi GBM have confirmed previous indications from BATSE of the presence of an underlying thermal component. Photospheric emission is indeed expected when the relativistic outflow emerging from the central engine becomes transparent to its own radiation, with a quasi-blackbody spectrum in absence of additional sub-photospheric dissipation. However, its intensity strongly depends on the acceleration mechanism - thermal or magnetic - of the flow. We aim to compute the thermal and non-thermal emissions produced by an outflow with a variable Lorentz factor, where the power injected at the origin is partially thermal (fraction epsilon_th) and partially magnetic (fraction 1-epsilon_th). The thermal emission is produced at the photosphere, and the non-thermal emission in the optically thin regime. Apart from the value of epsilon_th, we want to test how the other model parameters affect the observed ratio of the thermal to non-thermal emission. If the non-thermal emission is made by internal shocks, we self-consistently obtained the light curves and spectra of the thermal and non-thermal components for any distribution of the Lorentz factor in the flow. If the non-thermal emission results from magnetic reconnection we were unable to produce a light curve and could only compare the respective non-thermal and thermal spectra. In the different considered cases, we varied the model parameters to see when the thermal component in the light curve and/or spectrum is likely to show up or, on the contrary, to be hidden. We finally compared our results to the proposed evidence for the presence of a thermal component in GRB spectra. Focussing on GRB 090902B and GRB 10072B, we showed how these observations can be used to constrain the nature and acceleration mechanism of GRB outflows.
We propose a model for the spectral formation of Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) prompt emission, where the phenomenological Bands function is usually applied to describe the GRB prompt emission. We suggest that the GRB prompt emission is mainly a result of two upscattering processes. The first process is the Comptonization of relatively cold soft photons of the star off electrons of a hot shell of plasma of temperature T_e of the order of 10^{9} K (or kT_e~100 keV) that moves sub-relativistically with the bulk velocity V_b substantially less than the speed of light c. In this phase, the Comptonization parameter Y is high and the interaction between a blackbody-like soft seed photon population and hot electrons leads to formation of a saturated Comptonization spectrum modified by the sub-relativistic bulk outflow. The second process is an upscattering of the previously Comptonized spectrum by the plasma outflow once it becomes relativistic. This process gives rise to the high-energy power-law component above the peak in the EF(E)-diagram where F(E) is the energy flux. The latter process can be described by a convolution of the Comptonized spectrum with a broken-power-law Green function. Possible physical scenarios for this second upscattering process are discussed. In the framework of our model, we give an interpretation of the Amati relation between the intrinsic spectral peak photon energy and radiated energy or luminosity, and we propose a possible explanation of the GRB temporal variability.
The radiative process responsible for gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) prompt emission has not been identified yet. If dominated by fast-cooling synchrotron radiation, the part of the spectrum immediately below the $ u F_ u$ peak energy should display a power-law behavior with slope $alpha_2=-3/2$, which breaks to a higher value $alpha_1=-2/3$ (i.e. to a harder spectral shape) at lower energies. Prompt emission spectral data (usually available down to $sim10-20,$keV) are consistent with one single power-law behavior below the peak, with typical slope $langlealpharangle=-1$, higher than (and then inconsistent with) the expected value $alpha_2=-3/2$. To better characterize the spectral shape at low energy, we analyzed 14 GRBs for which the Swift X-ray Telescope started observations during the prompt. When available, Fermi-GBM observations have been included in the analysis. For 67% of the spectra, models that usually give a satisfactory description of the prompt (e.g., the Band model) fail in reproducing the $0.5-1000,$keV spectra: low-energy data outline the presence of a spectral break around a few keV.We then introduce an empirical fitting function that includes a low-energy power law $alpha_1$, a break energy $E_{rm break}$, a second power law $alpha_2$, and a peak energy $E_{rm peak}$. We find $langlealpha_1rangle=-0.66$ ($ rm sigma=0.35$), $langle log (E_{rm break}/rm keV)rangle=0.63$ ($ rm sigma=0.20$), $langlealpha_2rangle=-1.46$ ($rm sigma=0.31$), and $langle log (E_{rm peak}/rm keV)rangle=2.1$ ($ rm sigma=0.56$).The values $langlealpha_1rangle$ and $langlealpha_2rangle$ are very close to expectations from synchrotron radiation. In this context, $E_{rm break}$ corresponds to the cooling break frequency.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
