Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new usert-wise Berge and t-heavy hypergraphs
72
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
In many proofs concerning extremal parameters of Berge hypergraphs one starts with analyzing that part of that shadow graph which is contained in many hyperedges. Capturing this phenomenon we introduce two new types of hypergraphs. A hypergraph $mathcal{H}$ is a $t$-heavy copy of a graph $F$ if there is a copy of $F$ on its vertex set such that each edge of $F$ is contained in at least $t$ hyperedges of $mathcal{H}$. $mathcal{H}$ is a $t$-wise Berge copy of $F$ if additionally for distinct edges of $F$ those $t$ hyperedges are distinct. We extend known upper bounds on the Turan number of Berge hypergraphs to the $t$-wise Berge hypergraphs case. We asymptotically determine the Turan number of $t$-heavy and $t$-wise Berge copies of long paths and cycles and exactly determine the Turan number of $t$-heavy and $t$-wise Berge copies of cliques. In the case of 3-uniform hypergraphs, we consider the problem in more details and obtain additional results.
rate research
Read More
We generalize a result of Balister, Gy{H{o}}ri, Lehel and Schelp for hypergraphs. We determine the unique extremal structure of an $n$-vertex, $r$-uniform, connected, hypergraph with the maximum number of hyperedges, without a $k$-Berge-path, where $n geq N_{k,r}$, $kgeq 2r+13>17$.
For a fixed set of positive integers $R$, we say $mathcal{H}$ is an $R$-uniform hypergraph, or $R$-graph, if the cardinality of each edge belongs to $R$. An $R$-graph $mathcal{H}$ is emph{covering} if every vertex pair of $mathcal{H}$ is contained in some hyperedge. For a graph $G=(V,E)$, a hypergraph $mathcal{H}$ is called a textit{Berge}-$G$, denoted by $BG$, if there exists an injection $f: E(G) to E(mathcal{H})$ such that for every $e in E(G)$, $e subseteq f(e)$. In this note, we define a new type of Ramsey number, namely the emph{cover Ramsey number}, denoted as $hat{R}^R(BG_1, BG_2)$, as the smallest integer $n_0$ such that for every covering $R$-uniform hypergraph $mathcal{H}$ on $n geq n_0$ vertices and every $2$-edge-coloring (blue and red) of $mathcal{H}$ , there is either a blue Berge-$G_1$ or a red Berge-$G_2$ subhypergraph. We show that for every $kgeq 2$, there exists some $c_k$ such that for any finite graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$, $R(G_1, G_2) leq hat{R}^{[k]}(BG_1, BG_2) leq c_k cdot R(G_1, G_2)^3$. Moreover, we show that for each positive integer $d$ and $k$, there exists a constant $c = c(d,k)$ such that if $G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices with maximum degree at most $d$, then $hat{R}^{[k]}(BG,BG) leq cn$.
In this paper, we consider maximum possible value for the sum of cardinalities of hyperedges of a hypergraph without a Berge $4$-cycle. We significantly improve the previous upper bound provided by Gerbner and Palmer. Furthermore, we provide a construction that slightly improves the previous lower bound.
In this note, we introduce a new poset parameter called local $t$-dimension. We also discuss the fractional variants of this and other dimension-like parameters.
We start with a (q,t)-generalization of a binomial coefficient. It can be viewed as a polynomial in t that depends upon an integer q, with combinatorial interpretations when q is a positive integer, and algebraic interpretations when q is the order of a finite field. These (q,t)-binomial coefficients and their interpretations generalize further in two directions, one relating to column-strict tableaux and Macdonalds ``seventh variation of Schur functions, the other relating to permutation statistics and Hilbert series from the invariant theory of GL_n(F_q).
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
