Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userAugment your batch: better training with larger batches
104
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Large-batch SGD is important for scaling training of deep neural networks. However, without fine-tuning hyperparameter schedules, the generalization of the model may be hampered. We propose to use batch augmentation: replicating instances of samples within the same batch with different data augmentations. Batch augmentation acts as a regularizer and an accelerator, increasing both generalization and performance scaling. We analyze the effect of batch augmentation on gradient variance and show that it empirically improves convergence for a wide variety of deep neural networks and datasets. Our results show that batch augmentation reduces the number of necessary SGD updates to achieve the same accuracy as the state-of-the-art. Overall, this simple yet effective method enables faster training and better generalization by allowing more computational resources to be used concurrently.
rate research
Read More
As an indispensable component, Batch Normalization (BN) has successfully improved the training of deep neural networks (DNNs) with mini-batches, by normalizing the distribution of the internal representation for each hidden layer. However, the effectiveness of BN would diminish with scenario of micro-batch (e.g., less than 10 samples in a mini-batch), since the estimated statistics in a mini-batch are not reliable with insufficient samples. In this paper, we present a novel normalization method, called Batch Kalman Normalization (BKN), for improving and accelerating the training of DNNs, particularly under the context of micro-batches. Specifically, unlike the existing solutions treating each hidden layer as an isolated system, BKN treats all the layers in a network as a whole system, and estimates the statistics of a certain layer by considering the distributions of all its preceding layers, mimicking the merits of Kalman Filtering. BKN has two appealing properties. First, it enables more stable training and faster convergence compared to previous works. Second, training DNNs using BKN performs substantially better than those using BN and its variants, especially when very small mini-batches are presented. On the image classification benchmark of ImageNet, using BKN powered networks we improve upon the best-published model-zoo results: reaching 74.0% top-1 val accuracy for InceptionV2. More importantly, using BKN achieves the comparable accuracy with extremely smaller batch size, such as 64 times smaller on CIFAR-10/100 and 8 times smaller on ImageNet.
Large-batch training approaches have enabled researchers to utilize large-scale distributed processing and greatly accelerate deep-neural net (DNN) training. For example, by scaling the batch size from 256 to 32K, researchers have been able to reduce the training time of ResNet50 on ImageNet from 29 hours to 2.2 minutes (Ying et al., 2018). In this paper, we propose a new approach called linear-epoch gradual-warmup (LEGW) for better large-batch training. With LEGW, we are able to conduct large-batch training for both CNNs and RNNs with the Sqrt Scaling scheme. LEGW enables Sqrt Scaling scheme to be useful in practice and as a result we achieve much better results than the Linear Scaling learning rate scheme. For LSTM applications, we are able to scale the batch size by a factor of 64 without losing accuracy and without tuning the hyper-parameters. For CNN applications, LEGW is able to achieve the same accuracy even as we scale the batch size to 32K. LEGW works better than previous large-batch auto-tuning techniques. LEGW achieves a 5.3X average speedup over the baselines for four LSTM-based applications on the same hardware. We also provide some theoretical explanations for LEGW.
In an increasing number of domains it has been demonstrated that deep learning models can be trained using relatively large batch sizes without sacrificing data efficiency. However the limits of this massive data parallelism seem to differ from domain to domain, ranging from batches of tens of thousands in ImageNet to batches of millions in RL agents that play the game Dota 2. To our knowledge there is limited conceptual understanding of why these limits to batch size differ or how we might choose the correct batch size in a new domain. In this paper, we demonstrate that a simple and easy-to-measure statistic called the gradient noise scale predicts the largest useful batch size across many domains and applications, including a number of supervised learning datasets (MNIST, SVHN, CIFAR-10, ImageNet, Billion Word), reinforcement learning domains (Atari and Dota), and even generative model training (autoencoders on SVHN). We find that the noise scale increases as the loss decreases over a training run and depends on the model size primarily through improved model performance. Our empirically-motivated theory also describes the tradeoff between compute-efficiency and time-efficiency, and provides a rough model of the benefits of adaptive batch-size training.
Adversarial training, a method for learning robust deep networks, is typically assumed to be more expensive than traditional training due to the necessity of constructing adversarial examples via a first-order method like projected gradient decent (PGD). In this paper, we make the surprising discovery that it is possible to train empirically robust models using a much weaker and cheaper adversary, an approach that was previously believed to be ineffective, rendering the method no more costly than standard training in practice. Specifically, we show that adversarial training with the fast gradient sign method (FGSM), when combined with random initialization, is as effective as PGD-based training but has significantly lower cost. Furthermore we show that FGSM adversarial training can be further accelerated by using standard techniques for efficient training of deep networks, allowing us to learn a robust CIFAR10 classifier with 45% robust accuracy to PGD attacks with $epsilon=8/255$ in 6 minutes, and a robust ImageNet classifier with 43% robust accuracy at $epsilon=2/255$ in 12 hours, in comparison to past work based on free adversarial training which took 10 and 50 hours to reach the same respective thresholds. Finally, we identify a failure mode referred to as catastrophic overfitting which may have caused previous attempts to use FGSM adversarial training to fail. All code for reproducing the experiments in this paper as well as pretrained model weights are at https://github.com/locuslab/fast_adversarial.
Federated learning (FL) refers to the learning paradigm that trains machine learning models directly in the decentralized systems consisting of smart edge devices without transmitting the raw data, which avoids the heavy communication costs and privacy concerns. Given the typical heterogeneous data distributions in such situations, the popular FL algorithm emph{Federated Averaging} (FedAvg) suffers from weight divergence and thus cannot achieve a competitive performance for the global model (denoted as the emph{initial performance} in FL) compared to centralized methods. In this paper, we propose the local continual training strategy to address this problem. Importance weights are evaluated on a small proxy dataset on the central server and then used to constrain the local training. With this additional term, we alleviate the weight divergence and continually integrate the knowledge on different local clients into the global model, which ensures a better generalization ability. Experiments on various FL settings demonstrate that our method significantly improves the initial performance of federated models with few extra communication costs.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
