Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userEasy to Fool? Testing the Anti-evasion Capabilities of PDF Malware Scanners
64
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Saeed Ehteshamifar
Publication date
2019
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Authors
Saeed Ehteshamifar
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Malware scanners try to protect users from opening malicious documents by statically or dynamically analyzing documents. However, malware developers may apply evasions that conceal the maliciousness of a document. Given the variety of existing evasions, systematically assessing the impact of evasions on malware scanners remains an open challenge. This paper presents a novel methodology for testing the capability of malware scanners to cope with evasions. We apply the methodology to malicious Portable Document Format (PDF) documents and present an in-depth study of how current PDF evasions affect 41 state-of-the-art malware scanners. The study is based on a framework for creating malicious PDF documents that use one or more evasions. Based on such documents, we measure how effective different evasions are at concealing the maliciousness of a document. We find that many static and dynamic scanners can be easily fooled by relatively simple evasions and that the effectiveness of different evasions varies drastically. Our work not only is a call to arms for improving current malware scanners, but by providing a large-scale corpus of malicious PDF documents with evasions, we directly support the development of improved tools to detect document-based malware. Moreover, our methodology paves the way for a quantitative evaluation of evasions in other kinds of malware.
rate research
Read More
Machine learning (ML) classifiers are vulnerable to adversarial examples. An adversarial example is an input sample which is slightly modified to induce misclassification in an ML classifier. In this work, we investigate white-box and grey-box evasion attacks to an ML-based malware detector and conduct performance evaluations in a real-world setting. We compare the defense approaches in mitigating the attacks. We propose a framework for deploying grey-box and black-box attacks to malware detection systems.
Although state-of-the-art PDF malware classifiers can be trained with almost perfect test accuracy (99%) and extremely low false positive rate (under 0.1%), it has been shown that even a simple adversary can evade them. A practically useful malware classifier must be robust against evasion attacks. However, achieving such robustness is an extremely challenging task. In this paper, we take the first steps towards training robust PDF malware classifiers with verifiable robustness properties. For instance, a robustness property can enforce that no matter how many pages from benign documents are inserted into a PDF malware, the classifier must still classify it as malicious. We demonstrate how the worst-case behavior of a malware classifier with respect to specific robustness properties can be formally verified. Furthermore, we find that training classifiers that satisfy formally verified robustness properties can increase the evasion cost of unbounded (i.e., not bounded by the robustness properties) attackers by eliminating simple evasion attacks. Specifically, we propose a new distance metric that operates on the PDF tree structure and specify two classes of robustness properties including subtree insertions and deletions. We utilize state-of-the-art verifiably robust training method to build robust PDF malware classifiers. Our results show that, we can achieve 92.27% average verified robust accuracy over three properties, while maintaining 99.74% accuracy and 0.56% false positive rate. With simple robustness properties, our robust model maintains 7% higher robust accuracy than all the baseline models against unrestricted whitebox attacks. Moreover, the state-of-the-art and new adaptive evolutionary attackers need up to 10 times larger $L_0$ feature distance and 21 times more PDF basic mutations (e.g., inserting and deleting objects) to evade our robust model than the baselines.
Malware remains a big threat to cyber security, calling for machine learning based malware detection. While promising, such detectors are known to be vulnerable to evasion attacks. Ensemble learning typically facilitates countermeasures, while attackers can leverage this technique to improve attack effectiveness as well. This motivates us to investigate which kind of robustness the ensemble defense or effectiveness the ensemble attack can achieve, particularly when they combat with each other. We thus propose a new attack approach, named mixture of attacks, by rendering attackers capable of multiple generative methods and multiple manipulation sets, to perturb a malware example without ruining its malicious functionality. This naturally leads to a new instantiation of adversarial training, which is further geared to enhancing the ensemble of deep neural networks. We evaluate defenses using Android malware detectors against 26 different attacks upon two practical datasets. Experimental results show that the new adversarial training significantly enhances the robustness of deep neural networks against a wide range of attacks, ensemble methods promote the robustness when base classifiers are robust enough, and yet ensemble attacks can evade the enhanced malware detectors effectively, even notably downgrading the VirusTotal service.
Malware is a piece of software that was written with the intent of doing harm to data, devices, or people. Since a number of new malware variants can be generated by reusing codes, malware attacks can be easily launched and thus become common in recent years, incurring huge losses in businesses, governments, financial institutes, health providers, etc. To defeat these attacks, malware classification is employed, which plays an essential role in anti-virus products. However, existing works that employ either static analysis or dynamic analysis have major weaknesses in complicated reverse engineering and time-consuming tasks. In this paper, we propose a visualized malware classification framework called VisMal, which provides highly efficient categorization with acceptable accuracy. VisMal converts malware samples into images and then applies a contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization algorithm to enhance the similarity between malware image regions in the same family. We provided a proof-of-concept implementation and carried out an extensive evaluation to verify the performance of our framework. The evaluation results indicate that VisMal can classify a malware sample within 5.2ms and have an average accuracy of 96.0%. Moreover, VisMal provides security engineers with a simple visualization approach to further validate its performance.
The number of Android malware variants (clones) are on the rise and, to stop this attack of clones we need to develop new methods and techniques for analysing and detecting them. As a first step, we need to study how these malware clones are generated. This will help us better anticipate and recognize these clones. In this paper we present a new tool named DroidMorph, that provides morphing of Android applications (APKs) at different level of abstractions, and can be used to create Android application (malware/benign) clones. As a case study we perform testing and evaluating resilience of current commercial anti-malware products against attack of the Android malware clones generated by DroidMorph. We found that 8 out of 17 leading commercial anti-malware programs were not able to detect any of the morphed APKs. We hope that DroidMorph will be used in future research, to improve Android malware clones analysis and detection, and help stop them.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
