Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userHamiltonian Descent Methods
73
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Chris J. Maddison
Publication date
2018
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We propose a family of optimization methods that achieve linear convergence using first-order gradient information and constant step sizes on a class of convex functions much larger than the smooth and strongly convex ones. This larger class includes functions whose second derivatives may be singular or unbounded at their minima. Our methods are discretizations of conformal Hamiltonian dynamics, which generalize the classical momentum method to model the motion of a particle with non-standard kinetic energy exposed to a dissipative force and the gradient field of the function of interest. They are first-order in the sense that they require only gradient computation. Yet, crucially the kinetic gradient map can be designed to incorporate information about the convex conjugate in a fashion that allows for linear convergence on convex functions that may be non-smooth or non-strongly convex. We study in detail one implicit and two explicit methods. For one explicit method, we provide conditions under which it converges to stationary points of non-convex functions. For all, we provide conditions on the convex function and kinetic energy pair that guarantee linear convergence, and show that these conditions can be satisfied by functions with power growth. In sum, these methods expand the class of convex functions on which linear convergence is possible with first-order computation.
rate research
Read More
Epoch gradient descent method (a.k.a. Epoch-GD) proposed by Hazan and Kale (2011) was deemed a breakthrough for stochastic strongly convex minimization, which achieves the optimal convergence rate of $O(1/T)$ with $T$ iterative updates for the {it objective gap}. However, its extension to solving stochastic min-max problems with strong convexity and strong concavity still remains open, and it is still unclear whether a fast rate of $O(1/T)$ for the {it duality gap} is achievable for stochastic min-max optimization under strong convexity and strong concavity. Although some recent studies have proposed stochastic algorithms with fast convergence rates for min-max problems, they require additional assumptions about the problem, e.g., smoothness, bi-linear structure, etc. In this paper, we bridge this gap by providing a sharp analysis of epoch-wise stochastic gradient descent ascent method (referred to as Epoch-GDA) for solving strongly convex strongly concave (SCSC) min-max problems, without imposing any additional assumption about smoothness or the functions structure. To the best of our knowledge, our result is the first one that shows Epoch-GDA can achieve the optimal rate of $O(1/T)$ for the duality gap of general SCSC min-max problems. We emphasize that such generalization of Epoch-GD for strongly convex minimization problems to Epoch-GDA for SCSC min-max problems is non-trivial and requires novel technical analysis. Moreover, we notice that the key lemma can also be used for proving the convergence of Epoch-GDA for weakly-convex strongly-concave min-max problems, leading to a nearly optimal complexity without resorting to smoothness or other structural conditions.
Difference-of-Convex (DC) minimization, referring to the problem of minimizing the difference of two convex functions, has been found rich applications in statistical learning and studied extensively for decades. However, existing methods are primarily based on multi-stage convex relaxation, only leading to weak optimality of critical points. This paper proposes a coordinate descent method for minimizing DC functions based on sequential nonconvex approximation. Our approach iteratively solves a nonconvex one-dimensional subproblem globally, and it is guaranteed to converge to a coordinate-wise stationary point. We prove that this new optimality condition is always stronger than the critical point condition and the directional point condition when the objective function is weakly convex. For comparisons, we also include a naive variant of coordinate descent methods based on sequential convex approximation in our study. When the objective function satisfies an additional regularity condition called emph{sharpness}, coordinate descent methods with an appropriate initialization converge emph{linearly} to the optimal solution set. Also, for many applications of interest, we show that the nonconvex one-dimensional subproblem can be computed exactly and efficiently using a breakpoint searching method. We present some discussions and extensions of our proposed method. Finally, we have conducted extensive experiments on several statistical learning tasks to show the superiority of our approach. Keywords: Coordinate Descent, DC Minimization, DC Programming, Difference-of-Convex Programs, Nonconvex Optimization, Sparse Optimization, Binary Optimization.
Despite the strong theoretical guarantees that variance-reduced finite-sum optimization algorithms enjoy, their applicability remains limited to cases where the memory overhead they introduce (SAG/SAGA), or the periodic full gradient computation they require (SVRG/SARAH) are manageable. A promising approach to achieving variance reduction while avoiding these drawbacks is the use of importance sampling instead of control variates. While many such methods have been proposed in the literature, directly proving that they improve the convergence of the resulting optimization algorithm has remained elusive. In this work, we propose an importance-sampling-based algorithm we call SRG (stochastic reweighted gradient). We analyze the convergence of SRG in the strongly-convex case and show that, while it does not recover the linear rate of control variates methods, it provably outperforms SGD. We pay particular attention to the time and memory overhead of our proposed method, and design a specialized red-black tree allowing its efficient implementation. Finally, we present empirical results to support our findings.
The method of block coordinate gradient descent (BCD) has been a powerful method for large-scale optimization. This paper considers the BCD method that successively updates a series of blocks selected according to a Markov chain. This kind of block selection is neither i.i.d. random nor cyclic. On the other hand, it is a natural choice for some applications in distributed optimization and Markov decision process, where i.i.d. random and cyclic selections are either infeasible or very expensive. By applying mixing-time properties of a Markov chain, we prove convergence of Markov chain BCD for minimizing Lipschitz differentiable functions, which can be nonconvex. When the functions are convex and strongly convex, we establish both sublinear and linear convergence rates, respectively. We also present a method of Markov chain inertial BCD. Finally, we discuss potential applications.
We study ways to accelerate greedy coordinate descent in theory and in practice, where accelerate refers either to $O(1/k^2)$ convergence in theory, in practice, or both. We introduce and study two algorithms: Accelerated Semi-Greedy Coordinate Descent (ASCD) and Accelerated Greedy Coordinate Descent (AGCD). While ASCD takes greedy steps in the $x$-updates and randomized steps in the $z$-updates, AGCD is a straightforward extension of standard greedy coordinate descent that only takes greedy steps. On the theory side, our main results are for ASCD: we show that ASCD achieves $O(1/k^2)$ convergence, and it also achieves accelerated linear convergence for strongly convex functions. On the empirical side, we observe that both AGCD and ASCD outperform Accelerated Randomized Coordinate Descent on a variety of instances. In particular, we note that AGCD significantly outperforms the other accelerated coordinate descent methods in numerical tests, in spite of a lack of theoretical guarantees for this method. To complement the empirical study of AGCD, we present a Lyapunov energy function argument that points to an explanation for why a direct extension of the acceleration proof for AGCD does not work; and we also introduce a technical condition under which AGCD is guaranteed to have accelerated convergence. Last of all, we confirm that this technical condition holds in our empirical study.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
