For seven decades, the widely held view has been that the formation, the migration and the decay of short-lived starspots explain the constantly changing light curves of chromospherically active stars. Our hypothesis is that these deceptive observed light curves are interference of two real constant period light curves of long-lived starspots. The slow motion of these long-lived starspots with respect to each other causes the observed light curve changes. This hypothesis contradicts the current views of starspots. Therefore, we subject it to eight reproducible tests. Our new period finding method detects the two real light curves of FK Com. Our hypothesis is a total success: all real light curve parameters are directly connected to the long-lived starspots which are also seen in the Doppler images of FK Com.These parameters are spatially and temporally correlated just like in the Sun, including weak solar-like surface differential rotation. As for other chromospherically active stars, all eight reproducible tests also support our hypothesis. It explains many spurious phenomena: the rapid light curve changes, the short starspot life-times, the rapid rotation period changes, the active longitudes, the starspot migration, the period cycles, the amplitude cycles and the minimum epoch cycles. It also explains why the light curves and the Doppler images give contradicting surface differential rotation estimates even for the same individual star, as well as the abrupt 180 degrees shifts of activity (the flip-flop events) and the long-term mean light curves. We argue that the current views of starspots need to be revised.
Download