Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userMethod G: Uncertainty Quantification for Distributed Data Problems using Generalized Fiducial Inference
73
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Jan Hannig
Publication date
2018
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
It is not unusual for a data analyst to encounter data sets distributed across several computers. This can happen for reasons such as privacy concerns, efficiency of likelihood evaluations, or just the sheer size of the whole data set. This presents new challenges to statisticians as even computing simple summary statistics such as the median becomes computationally challenging. Furthermore, if other advanced statistical methods are desired, novel computational strategies are needed. In this paper we propose a new approach for distributed analysis of massive data that is suitable for generalized fiducial inference and is based on a careful implementation of a divide and conquer strategy combined with importance sampling. The proposed approach requires only small amount of communication between nodes, and is shown to be asymptotically equivalent to using the whole data set. Unlike most existing methods, the proposed approach produces uncertainty measures (such as confidence intervals) in addition to point estimates for parameters of interest. The proposed approach is also applied to the analysis of a large set of solar images.
rate research
Read More
Due to their accuracies, methods based on ensembles of regression trees are a popular approach for making predictions. Some common examples include Bayesian additive regression trees, boosting and random forests. This paper focuses on honest random forests, which add honesty to the original form of random forests and are proved to have better statistical properties. The main contribution is a new method that quantifies the uncertainties of the estimates and predictions produced by honest random forests. The proposed method is based on the generalized fiducial methodology, and provides a fiducial density function that measures how likely each single honest tree is the true model. With such a density function, estimates and predictions, as well as their confidence/prediction intervals, can be obtained. The promising empirical properties of the proposed method are demonstrated by numerical comparisons with several state-of-the-art methods, and by applications to a few real data sets. Lastly, the proposed method is theoretically backed up by a strong asymptotic guarantee.
The lectures were prepared for the {E}cole Th{e}matique sur les Incertitudes en Calcul Scientifique (ETICS) in September 2021.
The problem of estimating certain distributions over ${0,1}^d$ is considered here. The distribution represents a quantum system of $d$ qubits, where there are non-trivial dependencies between the qubits. A maximum entropy approach is adopted to reconstruct the distribution from exact moments or observed empirical moments. The Robbins Monro algorithm is used to solve the intractable maximum entropy problem, by constructing an unbiased estimator of the un-normalized target with a sequential Monte Carlo sampler at each iteration. In the case of empirical moments, this coincides with a maximum likelihood estimator. A Bayesian formulation is also considered in order to quantify posterior uncertainty. Several approaches are proposed in order to tackle this challenging problem, based on recently developed methodologies. In particular, unbiased estimators of the gradient of the log posterior are constructed and used within a provably convergent Langevin-based Markov chain Monte Carlo method. The methods are illustrated on classically simulated output from quantum simulators.
Fiducial Inference, introduced by Fisher in the 1930s, has a long history, which at times aroused passionate disagreements. However, its application has been largely confined to relatively simple parametric problems. In this paper, we present what might be the first time fiducial inference, as generalized by Hannig et al. (2016), is systematically applied to estimation of a nonparametric survival function under right censoring. We find that the resulting fiducial distribution gives rise to surprisingly good statistical procedures applicable to both one sample and two sample problems. In particular, we use the fiducial distribution of a survival function to construct pointwise and curvewise confidence intervals for the survival function, and propose tests based on the curvewise confidence interval. We establish a functional Bernstein-von Mises theorem, and perform thorough simulation studies in scenarios with different levels of censoring. The proposed fiducial based confidence intervals maintain coverage in situations where asymptotic methods often have substantial coverage problems. Furthermore, the average length of the proposed confidence intervals is often shorter than the length of competing methods that maintain coverage. Finally, the proposed fiducial test is more powerful than various types of log-rank tests and sup log-rank tests in some scenarios. We illustrate the proposed fiducial test comparing chemotherapy against chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy using data from the treatment of locally unresectable gastric cancer.
Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) place priors over the parameters in a neural network. Inference in BNNs, however, is difficult; all inference methods for BNNs are approximate. In this work, we empirically compare the quality of predictive uncertainty estimates for 10 common inference methods on both regression and classification tasks. Our experiments demonstrate that commonly used metrics (e.g. test log-likelihood) can be misleading. Our experiments also indicate that inference innovations designed to capture structure in the posterior do not necessarily produce high quality posterior approximations.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
