Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userEvery metric space is separable in function realizability
149
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Thorsten Wissmann
Publication date
2018
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We first show that in the function realizability topos every metric space is separable, and every object with decidable equality is countable. More generally, working with synthetic topology, every $T_0$-space is separable and every discrete space is countable. It follows that intuitionistic logic does not show the existence of a non-separable metric space, or an uncountable set with decidable equality, even if we assume principles that are validated by function realizability, such as Dependent and Function choice, Markovs principle, and Brouwers continuity and fan principles.
rate research
Read More
We compare three notions of genericity of separable metric structures. Our analysis provides a general model theoretic technique of showing that structures are generic in descriptive set theoretic (topological) sense and in measure theoretic sense. In particular, it gives a new perspective on Vershiks theorems on genericity and randomness of Urysohns space among separable metric spaces.
We begin to study classical dimension theory from the computable analysis (TTE) point of view. For computable metric spaces, several effectivisations of zero-dimensionality are shown to be equivalent. The part of this characterisation that concerns covering dimension extends to higher dimensions and to closed shrinkings of finite open covers. To deal with zero-dimensional subspaces uniformly, four operations (relative to the space and a class of subspaces) are defined; these correspond to definitions of inductive and covering dimensions and a countable basis condition. Finally, an effective retract characterisation of zero-dimensionality is proven under an effective compactness condition. In one direction this uses a version of the construction of bilocated sets.
Goodmans theorem (1976) states that intuitionistic finite-type arithmetic plus the axiom of choice plus the axiom of relativized dependent choice is conservative over Heyting arithmetic. The same result applies to the extensional variant. This is due to Beeson (1979). In this paper we modify Goodman realizability (1978) and provide a new proof of the extensional case.
We prove that every 2-Segal space is unital.
A new criterion of comprehension is defined, initially termed by myself as connected and finally as Acyclic by Mr. Randall Holmes. Acyclic comprehension simply asserts that for any acyclic formula phi, the set {x:phi} exists. I first presented this criterion semi-formally to Mr. Randall Holmes, who further made the first rigorous definition of it, a definition that I finally simplified to the one presented here. Later Mr. Holmes made another presentation of the definition which is also mentioned here. He pointed to me that acyclic comprehension is implied by stratification, and posed the question as to whether it is equivalent to full stratification or strictly weaker. He and initially I myself thought that it was strictly weaker; Mr. Randall Holmes actually conjectured that it is very weak. Surprisingly it turned to be equivalent to full stratification as I proved here
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
