Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userA revised lens time delay for JVAS B0218+357 from a reanalysis of VLA monitoring data
162
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
A. D. Biggs
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We have reanalysed the 1996/1997 VLA monitoring data of the gravitational lens system JVAS B0218+357 to produce improved total flux density and polarization variability curves at 15, 8.4 and 5 GHz. This has been done using improved calibration techniques, accurate subtraction of the emission from the Einstein ring and careful correction of various systematic effects, especially an offset in polarization position angle that is hour-angle dependent. The variations in total and polarized flux density give the best constraints and we determine a combined delay estimate of $11.3 pm 0.2$ d (1$sigma$). This is consistent with the $gamma$-ray value recently derived using the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope and thus we find no evidence for a positional shift between the radio and $gamma$-ray emitting regions. Combined with the previously published lens model found using LensClean, the new delay gives a value for the Hubble constant of $H_0 = 72.9 pm 2.6$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ (1$sigma$).
rate research
Read More
We present the results of phase-referenced VLBA+Effelsberg observations at five frequencies of the gravitational lens B0218+357 to establish the precise registration of the A and B lensed image positions.
We have analysed archival VLA 8.4-GHz monitoring data of the gravitational lens system JVAS B1030+074 with the goal of determining the time delay between the two lensed images via the polarization variability. In contrast to the previously published total intensity variations, we detect correlated variability in polarized flux density, percentage polarization and polarization position angle. The latter includes a fast ($<$5d) 90-degree rotation event. Our best estimate of the time delay is $146pm6$d (1$sigma$), considerably longer than that predicted by the lens model presented in the discovery paper. Additional model constraints will be needed before this system can be used to measure $H_0$, for example through a detection of the lensed sources VLBI jet in image B. No time delay is visible in total flux density and this is partially due to much greater scatter in the image B measurements. This must be due to a propagation effect as the radio waves pass through the ISM of the lensing galaxies or the Galaxy.
We present results on multifrequency Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) monitoring observations of the double-image gravitationally lensed blazar JVAS B0218+357. Multi-epoch observations started less than one month after the gamma-ray flare detected in 2012 by the Large Area Telescope on board Fermi, and spanned a 2-month interval. The radio light curves did not reveal any significant flux density variability, suggesting that no clear correlation between the high energy and low-energy emission is present. This behaviour was confirmed also by the long-term Owens Valley Radio Observatory monitoring data at 15 GHz. The milliarcsecond-scale resolution provided by the VLBA observations allowed us to resolve the two images of the lensed blazar, which have a core-jet structure. No significant morphological variation is found by the analysis of the multi-epoch data, suggesting that the region responsible for the gamma-ray variability is located in the core of the AGN, which is opaque up to the highest observing frequency of 22 GHz.
We address the issue of anomalous image flux ratios seen in the double-image gravitational lens JVAS B0218+357. From the multi-frequency observations presented in a recent study (Mittal et al. 2006) and several previous observations made by other authors, the anomaly is well-established in that the image flux-density ratio (A/B) decreases from 3.9 to 2.0 over the observed frequency range from 15 GHz to 1.65 GHz. In Mittal et al. (2006), the authors investigated whether an interplay between a frequency-dependent structure of the background radio-source and a gradient in the relative image-magnification can explain away the anomaly. Insufficient shifts in the image centroids with frequency led them to discard the above effect as the cause of the anomaly. In this paper, we first take this analysis further by evaluating the combined effect of the background source extension and magnification gradients in the lens plane in more detail. This is done by making a direct use of the observed VLBI flux-distributions for each image to estimate the image flux-density ratios at different frequencies from a lens-model. As a result of this investigation, this mechanism does not account for the anomaly. Following this, we analyze the effects of mechanisms which are non-gravitational in nature on the image flux ratios in B0218+357. These are free-free absorption and scattering, and are assumed to occur under the hypothesis of a molecular cloud residing in the lens galaxy along the line-of-sight to image A. We show that free-free absorption due to an H II region covering the entire structure of image A at 1.65 GHz can explain the image flux ratio anomaly. We also discuss whether H II regions with physical parameters as derived from our analysis are consistent with those observed in Galactic and extragalactic H II regions.
We present the results of phase-referenced VLBA+Effelsberg observations at five frequencies of the double-image gravitational lens JVAS B0218+357, made to establish the precise registration of the A and B lensed image positions. The motivation behind these observations is to investigate the anomalous variation of the image flux density ratio (A/B) with frequency - this ratio changes by almost a factor of two over a frequency range from 1.65 GHz to 15.35 GHz. We investigate whether frequency dependent image positions, combined with a magnification gradient across the image field, could give rise to the anomaly. Our observations confirm the variation of image flux ratio with frequency. The results from our phase-reference astrometry, taken together with the lens mass model of Wucknitz et al. (2004), show that shifts of the image peaks and centroids are too small to account for the observed frequency-dependent ratio.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
