Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userOn Structural Parameterizations of the Edge Disjoint Paths Problem
108
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Robert Ganian
Publication date
2017
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
In this paper we revisit the classical Edge Disjoint Paths (EDP) problem, where one is given an undirected graph G and a set of terminal pairs P and asks whether G contains a set of pairwise edge-disjoint paths connecting every terminal pair in P. Our focus lies on structural parameterizations for the problem that allow for efficient (polynomial-time or fpt) algorithms. As our first result, we answer an open question stated in Fleszar, Mnich, and Spoerhase (2016), by showing that the problem can be solved in polynomial time if the input graph has a feedback vertex set of size one. We also show that EDP parameterized by the treewidth and the maximum degree of the input graph is fixed-parameter tractable. Having developed two novel algorithms for EDP using structural restrictions on the input graph, we then turn our attention towards the augmented graph, i.e., the graph obtained from the input graph after adding one edge between every terminal pair. In constrast to the input graph, where EDP is known to remain NP-hard even for treewidth two, a result by Zhou et al. (2000) shows that EDP can be solved in non-uniform polynomial time if the augmented graph has constant treewidth; we note that the possible improvement of this result to an fpt-algorithm has remained open since then. We show that this is highly unlikely by establishing the W[1]-hardness of the problem parameterized by the treewidth (and even feedback vertex set) of the augmented graph. Finally, we develop an fpt-algorithm for EDP by exploiting a novel structural parameter of the augmented graph.
rate research
Read More
The problem of finding the maximum number of vertex-disjoint uni-color paths in an edge-colored graph (called MaxCDP) has been recently introduced in literature, motivated by applications in social network analysis. In this paper we investigate how the complexity of the problem depends on graph parameters (namely the number of vertices to remove to make the graph a collection of disjoint paths and the size of the vertex cover of the graph), which makes sense since graphs in social networks are not random and have structure. The problem was known to be hard to approximate in polynomial time and not fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) for the natural parameter. Here, we show that it is still hard to approximate, even in FPT-time. Finally, we introduce a new variant of the problem, called MaxCDDP, whose goal is to find the maximum number of vertex-disjoint and color-disjoint uni-color paths. We extend some of the results of MaxCDP to this new variant, and we prove that unlike MaxCDP, MaxCDDP is already hard on graphs at distance two from disjoint paths.
In the classical Node-Disjoint Paths (NDP) problem, the input consists of an undirected $n$-vertex graph $G$, and a collection $mathcal{M}={(s_1,t_1),ldots,(s_k,t_k)}$ of pairs of its vertices, called source-destination, or demand, pairs. The goal is to route the largest possible number of the demand pairs via node-disjoint paths. The best current approximation for the problem is achieved by a simple greedy algorithm, whose approximation factor is $O(sqrt n)$, while the best current negative result is an $Omega(log^{1/2-delta}n)$-hardness of approximation for any constant $delta$, under standard complexity assumptions. Even seemingly simple special cases of the problem are still poorly understood: when the input graph is a grid, the best current algorithm achieves an $tilde O(n^{1/4})$-approximation, and when it is a general planar graph, the best current approximation ratio of an efficient algorithm is $tilde O(n^{9/19})$. The best currently known lower bound on the approximability of both the
For two positive integers $k$ and $ell$, a $(k times ell)$-spindle is the union of $k$ pairwise internally vertex-disjoint directed paths with $ell$ arcs between two vertices $u$ and $v$. We are interested in the (parameterized) complexity of several problems consisting in deciding whether a given digraph contains a subdivision of a spindle, which generalize both the Maximum Flow and Longest Path problems. We obtain the following complexity dichotomy: for a fixed $ell geq 1$, finding the largest $k$ such that an input digraph $G$ contains a subdivision of a $(k times ell)$-spindle is polynomial-time solvable if $ell leq 3$, and NP-hard otherwise. We place special emphasis on finding spindles with exactly two paths and present FPT algorithms that are asymptotically optimal under the ETH. These algorithms are based on the technique of representative families in matroids, and use also color-coding as a subroutine. Finally, we study the case where the input graph is acyclic, and present several algorithmic and hardness results.
It is known that problems like Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set and Odd Cycle Transversal are polynomial time solvable in the class of chordal graphs. We consider these problems in a graph that has at most $k$ vertices whose deletion results in a chordal graph, when parameterized by $k$. While this investigation fits naturally into the recent trend of what are called `structural parameterizations, here we assume that the deletion set is not given. One method to solve them is to compute a $k$-sized or an approximate ($f(k)$ sized, for a function $f$) chordal vertex deletion set and then use the structural properties of the graph to design an algorithm. This method leads to at least $k^{mathcal{O}(k)}n^{mathcal{O}(1)}$ running time when we use the known parameterized or approximation algorithms for finding a $k$-sized chordal deletion set on an $n$ vertex graph. In this work, we design $2^{mathcal{O}(k)}n^{mathcal{O}(1)}$ time algorithms for these problems. Our algorithms do not compute a chordal vertex deletion set (or even an approximate solution). Instead, we construct a tree decomposition of the given graph in time $2^{mathcal{O}(k)}n^{mathcal{O}(1)}$ where each bag is a union of four cliques and $mathcal{O}(k)$ vertices. We then apply standard dynamic programming algorithms over this special tree decomposition. This special tree decomposition can be of independent interest. Our algorithms are adaptive (robust) in the sense that given an integer $k$, they detect whether the graph has a chordal vertex deletion set of size at most $k$ or output the special tree decomposition and solve the problem. We also show lower bounds for the problems we deal with under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH).
We study the classical NP-hard problems of finding maximum-size subsets from given sets of $k$ terminal pairs that can be routed via edge-disjoint paths (MaxEDP) or node-disjoint paths (MaxNDP) in a given graph. The approximability of MaxEDP/NDP is currently not well understood; the best known lower bound is $Omega(log^{1/2-epsilon}{n})$, assuming NP$~ otsubseteq~$ZPTIME$(n^{mathrm{poly}log n})$. This constitutes a significant gap to the best known approximation upper bound of $O(sqrt{n})$ due to Chekuri et al. (2006) and closing this gap is currently one of the big open problems in approximation algorithms. In their seminal paper, Raghavan and Thompson (Combinatorica, 1987) introduce the technique of randomized rounding for LPs; their technique gives an $O(1)$-approximation when edges (or nodes) may be used by $O(frac{log n}{loglog n})$ paths. In this paper, we strengthen the above fundamental results. We provide new bounds formulated in terms of the feedback vertex set number $r$ of a graph, which measures its vertex deletion distance to a forest. In particular, we obtain the following. * For MaxEDP, we give an $O(sqrt{r}cdot log^{1.5}{kr})$-approximation algorithm. As $rleq n$, up to logarithmic factors, our result strengthens the best known ratio $O(sqrt{n})$ due to Chekuri et al. * Further, we show how to route $Omega(mathrm{OPT})$ pairs with congestion $O(frac{log{kr}}{loglog{kr}})$, strengthening the bound obtained by the classic approach of Raghavan and Thompson. * For MaxNDP, we give an algorithm that gives the optimal answer in time $(k+r)^{O(r)}cdot n$. If $r$ is at most triple-exponential in $k$, this improves the best known algorithm for MaxNDP with parameter $k$, by Kawarabayashi and Wollan (STOC 2010). We complement these positive results by proving that MaxEDP is NP-hard even for $r=1$, and MaxNDP is W$[1]$-hard for parameter $r$.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
