Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userModeling Between-Study Heterogeneity for Improved Reproducibility in Gene Signature Selection and Clinical Prediction
368
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Naim Rashid
Publication date
2017
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
In the genomic era, the identification of gene signatures associated with disease is of significant interest. Such signatures are often used to predict clinical outcomes in new patients and aid clinical decision-making. However, recent studies have shown that gene signatures are often not replicable. This occurrence has practical implications regarding the generalizability and clinical applicability of such signatures. To improve replicability, we introduce a novel approach to select gene signatures from multiple datasets whose effects are consistently non-zero and account for between-study heterogeneity. We build our model upon some rank-based quantities, facilitating integration over different genomic datasets. A high dimensional penalized Generalized Linear Mixed Model (pGLMM) is used to select gene signatures and address data heterogeneity. We compare our method to some commonly used strategies that select gene signatures ignoring between-study heterogeneity. We provide asymptotic results justifying the performance of our method and demonstrate its advantage in the presence of heterogeneity through thorough simulation studies. Lastly, we motivate our method through a case study subtyping pancreatic cancer patients from four gene expression studies.
rate research
Read More
Meta-analysis combines pertinent information from existing studies to provide an overall estimate of population parameters/effect sizes, as well as to quantify and explain the differences between studies. However, testing the between-study heterogeneity is one of the most troublesome topics in meta-analysis research. Additionally, no methods have been proposed to test whether the size of the heterogeneity is larger than a specific level. The existing methods, such as the Q test and likelihood ratio (LR) tests, are criticized for their failure to control the Type I error rate and/or failure to attain enough statistical power. Although better reference distribution approximations have been proposed in the literature, the expression is complicated and the application is limited. In this article, we propose bootstrap based heterogeneity tests combining the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) ratio test or Q test with bootstrap procedures, denoted as B-REML-LRT and B-Q respectively. Simulation studies were conducted to examine and compare the performance of the proposed methods with the regular LR tests, the regular Q test, and the improved Q test in both the random-effects meta-analysis and mixed-effects meta-analysis. Based on the results of Type I error rates and statistical power, B-Q is recommended. An R package mathtt{boot.heterogeneity} is provided to facilitate the implementation of the proposed method.
Copulas provide a modular parameterization of multivariate distributions that decouples the modeling of marginals from the dependencies between them. Gaussian Mixture Copula Model (GMCM) is a highly flexible copula that can model many kinds of multi-modal dependencies, as well as asymmetric and tail dependencies. They have been effectively used in clustering non-Gaussian data and in Reproducibility Analysis, a meta-analysis method designed to verify the reliability and consistency of multiple high-throughput experiments. Parameter estimation for GMCM is challenging due to its intractable likelihood. The best previous methods have maximized a proxy-likelihood through a Pseudo Expectation Maximization (PEM) algorithm. They have no guarantees of convergence or convergence to the correct parameters. In this paper, we use Automatic Differentiation (AD) tools to develop a method, called AD-GMCM, that can maximize the exact GMCM likelihood. In our simulation studies and experiments with real data, AD-GMCM finds more accurate parameter estimates than PEM and yields better performance in clustering and Reproducibility Analysis. We discuss the advantages of an AD-based approach, to address problems related to monotonic increase of likelihood and parameter identifiability in GMCM. We also analyze, for GMCM, two well-known cases of degeneracy of maximum likelihood in GMM that can lead to spurious clustering solutions. Our analysis shows that, unlike GMM, GMCM is not affected in one of the cases.
We discuss Bayesian model uncertainty analysis and forecasting in sequential dynamic modeling of multivariate time series. The perspective is that of a decision-maker with a specific forecasting objective that guides thinking about relevant models. Based on formal Bayesian decision-theoretic reasoning, we develop a time-adaptive approach to exploring, weighting, combining and selecting models that differ in terms of predictive variables included. The adaptivity allows for changes in the sets of favored models over time, and is guided by the specific forecasting goals. A synthetic example illustrates how decision-guided variable selection differs from traditional Bayesian model uncertainty analysis and standard model averaging. An applied study in one motivating application of long-term macroeconomic forecasting highlights the utility of the new approach in terms of improving predictions as well as its ability to identify and interpret different sets of relevant models over time with respect to specific, defined forecasting goals.
In electronic health records (EHRs), latent subgroups of patients may exhibit distinctive patterning in their longitudinal health trajectories. For such data, growth mixture models (GMMs) enable classifying patients into different latent classes based on individual trajectories and hypothesized risk factors. However, the application of GMMs is hindered by the special missing data problem in EHRs, which manifests two patient-led missing data processes: the visit process and the response process for an EHR variable conditional on a patient visiting the clinic. If either process is associated with the process generating the longitudinal outcomes, then valid inferences require accounting for a nonignorable missing data mechanism. We propose a Bayesian shared parameter model that links GMMs of multiple longitudinal health outcomes, the visit process, and the response process of each outcome given a visit using a discrete latent class variable. Our focus is on multiple longitudinal health outcomes for which there can be a clinically prescribed visit schedule. We demonstrate our model in EHR measurements on early childhood weight and height z-scores. Using data simulations, we illustrate the statistical properties of our method with respect to subgroup-specific or marginal inferences. We built the R package EHRMiss for model fitting, selection, and checking.
The joint modeling of mean and dispersion (JMMD) provides an efficient method to obtain useful models for the mean and dispersion, especially in problems of robust design experiments. However, in the literature on JMMD there are few works dedicated to variable selection and this theme is still a challenge. In this article, we propose a procedure for selecting variables in JMMD, based on hypothesis testing and the quality of the models fit. A criterion for checking the goodness of fit is used, in each iteration of the selection process, as a filter for choosing the terms that will be evaluated by a hypothesis test. Three types of criteria were considered for checking the quality of the model fit in our variable selection procedure. The criteria used were: the extended Akaike information criterion, the corrected Akaike information criterion and a specific criterion for the JMMD, proposed by us, a type of extended adjusted coefficient of determination. Simulation studies were carried out to verify the efficiency of our variable selection procedure. In all situations considered, the proposed procedure proved to be effective and quite satisfactory. The variable selection process was applied to a real example from an industrial experiment.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
