Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userShear measurement bias I: dependencies on methods, simulation parameters and measured parameters
71
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We present a study of the dependencies of shear bias on simulation (input) and measured (output) parameters, noise, point-spread function anisotropy, pixel size, and the model bias coming from two different and independent galaxy shape estimators. We used simulated images from Galsim based on the GREAT3 control-space-constant branch, and we measured shear bias from a model-fitting method (gFIT) and a moment-based method (Kaiser-Squires-Broadhurst). We show the bias dependencies found on input and output parameters for both methods, and we identify the main dependencies and causes. Most of the results are consistent between the two estimators, an interesting result given the differences of the methods. We also find important dependences on orientation and morphology properties such as flux, size, and ellipticity. We show that noise and pixelization play an important role in the bias dependencies on the output properties and galaxy orientation. We show some examples of model bias that produce a bias dependence on the Sersic index n as well as a different shear bias between galaxies consisting of a single Sersic profile and galaxies with a disc and a bulge. We also see an important coupling between several properties on the bias dependences. Because of this, we need to study several measured properties simultaneously in order to properly understand the nature of shear bias. This paper serves as a first step towards a companion paper that describes a machine learning approach to modelling shear bias as a complex function of many observed properties.
rate research
Read More
We present a new method to estimate shear measurement bias in image simulations that significantly improves the precision with respect to current techniques. Our method is based on measuring the shear response for individual images. We generated shear
Sample selection is a necessary preparation for weak lensing measurement. It is well-known that selection itself may introduce bias in the measured shear signal. Using image simulation and the Fourier_Quad shear measurement pipeline, we quantify the selection bias in various commonly used selection function (signal-to-noise-ratio, magnitude, etc.). We proposed a new selection function defined in the power spectrum of the galaxy image. This new selection function has low selection bias, and it is particularly convenient for shear measurement pipelines based on Fourier transformation.
We use the forward modeling approach to galaxy clustering combined with the likelihood from the effective-field theory of large-scale structure to measure assembly bias, i.e. the dependence of halo bias on properties beyond the total mass, in the linear ($b_1$) and second order bias parameters ($b_2$ and $b_{K^2}$) of dark matter halos in $N$-body simulations. This is the first time that assembly bias in the tidal bias parameter $b_{K^2}$ is measured. We focus on three standard halo properties: the concentration $c$, spin $lambda$, and sphericity $s$, for which we find an assembly bias signal in $b_{K^2}$ that is opposite to that in $b_1$. Specifically, at fixed mass, halos that get more (less) positively biased in $b_1$, get less (more) negatively biased in $b_{K^2}$. We also investigate the impact of assembly bias on the $b_2(b_1)$ and $b_{K^2}(b_1)$ relations, and find that while the $b_2(b_1)$ relation stays roughly unchanged, assembly bias strongly impacts the $b_{K^2}(b_1)$ relation. This impact likely extends also to the corresponding relation for galaxies, which motivates future studies to design better priors on $b_{K^2}(b_1)$ for use in cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering data.
We present a new shear calibration method based on machine learning. The method estimates the individual shear responses of the objects from the combination of several measured properties on the images using supervised learning. The supervised learning uses the true individual shear responses obtained from copies of the image simulations with different shear values. On simulated GREAT3data, we obtain a residual bias after the calibration compatible with 0 and beyond Euclid requirements for a signal-to-noise ratio > 20 within ~15 CPU hours of training using only ~10^5 objects. This efficient machine-learning approach can use a smaller data set because the method avoids the contribution from shape noise. The low dimensionality of the input data also leads to simple neural network architectures. We compare it to the recently described method Metacalibration, which shows similar performances. The different methods and systematics suggest that the two methods are very good complementary methods. Our method can therefore be applied without much effort to any survey such as Euclid or the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, with fewer than a million images to simulate to learn the calibration function.
With the advent of large-scale weak lensing surveys there is a need to understand how realistic, scale-dependent systematics bias cosmic shear and dark energy measurements, and how they can be removed. Here we describe how spatial variations in the amplitude and orientation of realistic image distortions convolve with the measured shear field, mixing the even-parity convergence and odd-parity modes, and bias the shear power spectrum. Many of these biases can be removed by calibration to external data, the survey itself, or by modelling in simulations. The uncertainty in the calibration must be marginalised over and we calculate how this propagates into parameter estimation, degrading the dark energy Figure-of-Merit. We find that noise-like biases affect dark energy measurements the most, while spikes in the bias power have the least impact, reflecting their correlation with the effect of cosmological parameters. We argue that in order to remove systematic biases in cosmic shear surveys and maintain statistical power effort should be put into improving the accuracy of the bias calibration rather than minimising the size of the bias. In general, this appears to be a weaker condition for bias removal. We also investigate how to minimise the size of the calibration set for a fixed reduction in the Figure-of-Merit. These results can be used to model the effect of biases and calibration on a cosmic shear survey accurately, assess their impact on the measurement of modified gravity and dark energy models, and to optimise surveys and calibration requirements.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
