Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userSymmetry Learning for Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learning
333
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
In this paper we explore methods to exploit symmetries for ensuring sample efficiency in reinforcement learning (RL), this problem deserves ever increasing attention with the recent advances in the use of deep networks for complex RL tasks which require large amount of training data. We introduce a novel method to detect symmetries using reward trails observed during episodic experience and prove its completeness. We also provide a framework to incorporate the discovered symmetries for functional approximation. Finally we show that the use of potential based reward shaping is especially effective for our symmetry exploitation mechanism. Experiments on various classical problems show that our method improves the learning performance significantly by utilizing symmetry information.
rate research
Read More
This paper introduces Dex, a reinforcement learning environment toolkit specialized for training and evaluation of continual learning methods as well as general reinforcement learning problems. We also present the novel continual learning method of incremental learning, where a challenging environment is solved using optimal weight initialization learned from first solving a similar easier environment. We show that incremental learning can produce vastly superior results than standard methods by providing a strong baseline method across ten Dex environments. We finally develop a saliency method for qualitative analysis of reinforcement learning, which shows the impact incremental learning has on network attention.
Learning robust value functions given raw observations and rewards is now possible with model-free and model-based deep reinforcement learning algorithms. There is a third alternative, called Successor Representations (SR), which decomposes the value function into two components -- a reward predictor and a successor map. The successor map represents the expected future state occupancy from any given state and the reward predictor maps states to scalar rewards. The value function of a state can be computed as the inner product between the successor map and the reward weights. In this paper, we present DSR, which generalizes SR within an end-to-end deep reinforcement learning framework. DSR has several appealing properties including: increased sensitivity to distal reward changes due to factorization of reward and world dynamics, and the ability to extract bottleneck states (subgoals) given successor maps trained under a random policy. We show the efficacy of our approach on two diverse environments given raw pixel observations -- simple grid-world domains (MazeBase) and the Doom game engine.
Dealing with uncertainty is essential for efficient reinforcement learning. There is a growing literature on uncertainty estimation for deep learning from fixed datasets, but many of the most popular approaches are poorly-suited to sequential decision problems. Other methods, such as bootstrap sampling, have no mechanism for uncertainty that does not come from the observed data. We highlight why this can be a crucial shortcoming and propose a simple remedy through addition of a randomized untrainable `prior network to each ensemble member. We prove that this approach is efficient with linear representations, provide simple illustrations of its efficacy with nonlinear representations and show that this approach scales to large-scale problems far better than previous attempts.
The recent emergence of reinforcement learning has created a demand for robust statistical inference methods for the parameter estimates computed using these algorithms. Existing methods for statistical inference in online learning are restricted to settings involving independently sampled observations, while existing statistical inference methods in reinforcement learning (RL) are limited to the batch setting. The online bootstrap is a flexible and efficient approach for statistical inference in linear stochastic approximation algorithms, but its efficacy in settings involving Markov noise, such as RL, has yet to be explored. In this paper, we study the use of the online bootstrap method for statistical inference in RL. In particular, we focus on the temporal difference (TD) learning and Gradient TD (GTD) learning algorithms, which are themselves special instances of linear stochastic approximation under Markov noise. The method is shown to be distributionally consistent for statistical inference in policy evaluation, and numerical experiments are included to demonstrate the effectiveness of this algorithm at statistical inference tasks across a range of real RL environments.
Designing provably efficient algorithms with general function approximation is an important open problem in reinforcement learning. Recently, Wang et al.~[2020c] establish a value-based algorithm with general function approximation that enjoys $widetilde{O}(mathrm{poly}(dH)sqrt{K})$footnote{Throughout the paper, we use $widetilde{O}(cdot)$ to suppress logarithm factors. } regret bound, where $d$ depends on the complexity of the function class, $H$ is the planning horizon, and $K$ is the total number of episodes. However, their algorithm requires $Omega(K)$ computation time per round, rendering the algorithm inefficient for practical use. In this paper, by applying online sub-sampling techniques, we develop an algorithm that takes $widetilde{O}(mathrm{poly}(dH))$ computation time per round on average, and enjoys nearly the same regret bound. Furthermore, the algorithm achieves low switching cost, i.e., it changes the policy only $widetilde{O}(mathrm{poly}(dH))$ times during its execution, making it appealing to be implemented in real-life scenarios. Moreover, by using an upper-confidence based exploration-driven reward function, the algorithm provably explores the environment in the reward-free setting. In particular, after $widetilde{O}(mathrm{poly}(dH))/epsilon^2$ rounds of exploration, the algorithm outputs an $epsilon$-optimal policy for any given reward function.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
