Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userImpact of germline susceptibility variants in cancer genetic studies
51
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Jorge Fernandez-De-Cossio
Publication date
2016
fields
Biology
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Although somatic mutations are the main contributor to cancer, underlying germline alterations may increase the risk of cancer, mold the somatic alteration landscape and cooperate with acquired mutations to promote the tumor onset and/or maintenance. Therefore, both tumor genome and germline sequence data have to be analyzed to have a more complete picture of the overall genetic foundation of the disease. To reinforce such notion we quantitatively assess the bias of restricting the analysis to somatic mutation data using mutational data from well-known cancer genes which displays both types of alterations, inherited and somatically acquired mutations.
rate research
Read More
PURPOSE: The popularity of germline genetic panel testing has led to a vast accumulation of variant-level data. Variant names are not always consistent across laboratories and not easily mappable to public variant databases such as ClinVar. A tool that can automate the process of variants harmonization and mapping is needed to help clinicians ensure their variant interpretations are accurate. METHODS: We present a Python-based tool, Ask2Me VarHarmonizer, that incorporates data cleaning, name harmonization, and a four-attempt mapping to ClinVar procedure. We applied this tool to map variants from a pilot dataset collected from 11 clinical practices. Mapping results were evaluated with and without the transcript information. RESULTS: Using Ask2Me VarHarmonizer, 4728 out of 6027 variant entries (78%) were successfully mapped to ClinVar, corresponding to 3699 mappable unique variants. With the addition of 1099 unique unmappable variants, a total of 4798 unique variants were eventually identified. 427 (9%) of these had multiple names, of which 343 (7%) had multiple names within-practice. 99% mapping consistency was observed with and without transcript information. CONCLUSION: Ask2Me VarHarmonizer aggregates and structures variant data, harmonizes names, and maps variants to ClinVar. Performing harmonization removes the ambiguity and redundancy of variants from different sources.
The focus of pancreatic cancer research has been shifted from pancreatic cancer cells towards their microenvironment, involving pancreatic stellate cells that interact with cancer cells and influence tumor progression. To quantitatively understand the pancreatic cancer microenvironment, we construct a computational model for intracellular signaling networks of cancer cells and stellate cells as well as their intercellular communication. We extend the rule-based BioNetGen language to depict intra- and inter-cellular dynamics using discrete and continuous variables respectively. Our framework also enables a statistical model checking procedure for analyzing the system behavior in response to various perturbations. The results demonstrate the predictive power of our model by identifying important system properties that are consistent with existing experimental observations. We also obtain interesting insights into the development of novel therapeutic strategies for pancreatic cancer.
To enable personalized cancer treatment, machine learning models have been developed to predict drug response as a function of tumor and drug features. However, most algorithm development efforts have relied on cross validation within a single study to assess model accuracy. While an essential first step, cross validation within a biological data set typically provides an overly optimistic estimate of the prediction performance on independent test sets. To provide a more rigorous assessment of model generalizability between different studies, we use machine learning to analyze five publicly available cell line-based data sets: NCI60, CTRP, GDSC, CCLE and gCSI. Based on observed experimental variability across studies, we explore estimates of prediction upper bounds. We report performance results of a variety of machine learning models, with a multitasking deep neural network achieving the best cross-study generalizability. By multiple measures, models trained on CTRP yield the most accurate predictions on the remaining testing data, and gCSI is the most predictable among the cell line data sets included in this study. With these experiments and further simulations on partial data, two lessons emerge: (1) differences in viability assays can limit model generalizability across studies, and (2) drug diversity, more than tumor diversity, is crucial for raising model generalizability in preclinical screening.
Prediction of Overall Survival (OS) of brain cancer patients from multi-modal MRI is a challenging field of research. Most of the existing literature on survival prediction is based on Radiomic features, which does not consider either non-biological factors or the functional neurological status of the patient(s). Besides, the selection of an appropriate cut-off for survival and the presence of censored data create further problems. Application of deep learning models for OS prediction is also limited due to the lack of large annotated publicly available datasets. In this scenario we analyse the potential of two novel neuroimaging feature families, extracted from brain parcellation atlases and spatial habitats, along with classical radiomic and geometric features; to study their combined predictive power for analysing overall survival. A cross validation strategy with grid search is proposed to simultaneously select and evaluate the most predictive feature subset based on its predictive power. A Cox Proportional Hazard (CoxPH) model is employed for univariate feature selection, followed by the prediction of patient-specific survival functions by three multivariate parsimonious models viz. Coxnet, Random survival forests (RSF) and Survival SVM (SSVM). The brain cancer MRI data used for this research was taken from two open-access collections TCGA-GBM and TCGA-LGG available from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). Corresponding survival data for each patient was downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). A high cross validation $C-index$ score of $0.82pm.10$ was achieved using RSF with the best $24$ selected features. Age was found to be the most important biological predictor. There were $9$, $6$, $6$ and $2$ features selected from the parcellation, habitat, radiomic and region-based feature groups respectively.
Motivated by the size of cell line drug sensitivity data, researchers have been developing machine learning (ML) models for predicting drug response to advance cancer treatment. As drug sensitivity studies continue generating data, a common question is whether the proposed predictors can further improve the generalization performance with more training data. We utilize empirical learning curves for evaluating and comparing the data scaling properties of two neural networks (NNs) and two gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) models trained on four drug screening datasets. The learning curves are accurately fitted to a power law model, providing a framework for assessing the data scaling behavior of these predictors. The curves demonstrate that no single model dominates in terms of prediction performance across all datasets and training sizes, suggesting that the shape of these curves depends on the unique model-dataset pair. The multi-input NN (mNN), in which gene expressions and molecular drug descriptors are input into separate subnetworks, outperforms a single-input NN (sNN), where the cell and drug features are concatenated for the input layer. In contrast, a GBDT with hyperparameter tuning exhibits superior performance as compared with both NNs at the lower range of training sizes for two of the datasets, whereas the mNN performs better at the higher range of training sizes. Moreover, the trajectory of the curves suggests that increasing the sample size is expected to further improve prediction scores of both NNs. These observations demonstrate the benefit of using learning curves to evaluate predictors, providing a broader perspective on the overall data scaling characteristics. The fitted power law curves provide a forward-looking performance metric and can serve as a co-design tool to guide experimental biologists and computational scientists in the design of future experiments.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
