Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userX-ray Observations of Bow Shocks around Runaway O Stars. The case of $zeta$ Oph and BD+43$^{circ}$3654
64
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Jes\\'us Alberto Toal\\'a
Publication date
2016
fields
Physics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Non-thermal radiation has been predicted within bow shocks around runaway stars by recent theoretical works. We present X-ray observations towards the runaway stars $zeta$ Oph (Chandra and Suzaku) and BD+43$^{circ}$3654 (XMM-Newton) to search for the presence of non-thermal X-ray emission. We found no evidence of non-thermal emission spatially coincident with the bow shocks, nonetheless, diffuse emission is detected in the vicinity of $zeta$ Oph. After a careful analysis of its spectral characteristics we conclude that this emission has a thermal nature with a plasma temperature of $T approx 2 times10^{6}$ K. The cometary shape of this emission seems to be in line with recent predictions of radiation-hydrodynamic models of runaway stars. The case of BD+43$^{circ}$3654 is puzzling as non-thermal emission has been reported in a previous work for this source.
rate research
Read More
The bow shocks of runaway stars with strong stellar winds of over 2000 km s$^{-1}$ can serve as particle acceleration sites. The conversion from stellar wind luminosity into particle acceleration power has an efficiency of the same order of magnitude as those in supernova remnants, based on the radio emission from the bow shock region of runaway star BD+43$^circ$3654 citep{Benaglia10}.If this object exhibits typical characteristics, then runaway star systems can contribute a non-negligible fraction of Galactic cosmic-ray electrons. To constrain the maximum energy of accelerated particles from measurements of possible non-thermal emissions in the X-ray band, Suzaku observed BD+43$^circ$3654 in April 2011 with an exposure of 99 ks. Because the onboard instruments have a stable and low background level, Suzaku detected a possible enhancement over the background of $7.6pm 3.4$ cnt arcmin$^{-2}$ at the bow shock region, where the error represents the 3 sigma statistics only. However, the excess is not significant within the systematic errors of non-X-ray and cosmic-ray backgrounds of the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer, which are $pm 6.0$ and $pm 34$ cnt arcmin$^{-2}$, respectively, and the 3-sigma upper limit in the X-ray luminosity from the shock region, which is $1.1 times 10^{32}$ erg s$^{-1}$ per 41.2 arcmin$^2$ in the 0.5 to 10 keV band. This result leads to three conclusions: (1) a shock-heating process is inefficient on this system; (2) the maximum energy of electrons does not exceed $sim$ 10 TeV, corresponding to a Lorentz factor of less than $10^7$; and (3) the magnetic field in the shock acceleration site might not be as turbulent as those in pulsar wind nebulae and supernova remnants.
Massive runaway stars produce bow shocks through the interaction of their winds with the interstellar medium, with the prospect for particle acceleration by the shocks. These objects are consequently candidates for non-thermal emission. Our aim is to investigate the X-ray emission from these sources. We observed with XMM-Newton a sample of 5 bow shock runaways, which constitutes a significant improvement of the sample of bow shock runaways studied in X-rays so far. A careful analysis of the data did not reveal any X-ray emission related to the bow shocks. However, X-ray emission from the stars is detected, in agreement with the expected thermal emission from stellar winds. On the basis of background measurements we derive conservative upper limits between 0.3 and 10 keV on the bow shocks emission. Using a simple radiation model, these limits together with radio upper limits allow us to constrain some of the main physical quantities involved in the non-thermal emission processes, such as the magnetic field strength and the amount of incident infrared photons. The reasons likely responsible for the non-detection of non-thermal radiation are discussed. Finally, using energy budget arguments, we investigate the detectability of inverse Compton X-rays in a more extended sample of catalogued runaway star bow shocks. From our analysis we conclude that a clear identification of non-thermal X-rays from massive runaway bow shocks requires one order of magnitude (or higher) sensitivity improvement with respect to present observatories.
Runaway stars form bow shocks by sweeping up interstellar matter in their direction of motion. Theoretical models predict a spectrally wide non-thermal component reaching up to gamma-ray energies at a flux level detectable with current instruments. They were motivated by a detection of non-thermal radio emission from the bow shock of BD$+43^circ3654$ and a possible detection of non-thermal X-rays from AE Aurigae. A search in the high-energy regime using data from textit{Fermi}-LAT resulted in flux upper limits for 27 candidates listed in the first E-BOSS catalogue. We perform the first systematic search for TeV emission from bow shocks of runaway stars. Using all available archival H.E.S.S. I data we search for very-high-energy gamma-ray emission at the positions of bow shock candidates listed in the second E-BOSS catalogue. This catalogue comprises 73 bow shock candidates, 32 of which have been observed with the H.E.S.S. telescopes. None of the observed bow shock candidates shows significant emission in the H.E.S.S. energy range. The resulting upper limits are used to constrain current models for non-thermal emission from these objects.
We present results of our Chandra/ACIS observations of the field centered on the fast, runaway O star AE Aur and its bow shock. Previous XMM-Newton observations revealed an X-ray blob near the IR arc tracing the bow shock, possibly a nonthermal source consistent with models of Inverse Compton scattering of dust IR photons by electrons accelerated at the shock. The new, subarcsecond resolution Chandra data, while confirming the presence of the XMM-Newton source, clearly indicate that the latter is neither extended nor coincident with the IR arc and strongly suggest it is a background AGN. Motivated by results published for the bow shock of BD+43 3654, we extended our study to the radio domain, by analyzing archival EVLA data. We find no radio emission from the AE Aur bow shock either. The corresponding upper limits for the absorbed (unabsorbed) X-ray flux of 5.9(7.8)x10^-15 erg/cm^2/s (3 sigma) and, in the radio range, of 2 mJy (1.4 GHz), and 0.4 mJy (5.0 GHz), are used to put constraints on model predictions for particle acceleration within the bow shock. In the classical framework of Diffusive Shock Acceleration, we find that the predicted X-ray and radio emission by the bow shock is at least two orders of magnitude below the current upper limits, consistent with the systematic non-detections of up to 60 stellar bow shocks. The only exception so far remains that of BD+43 3654, probably the result of its very large mass-loss rate among runaway O stars.
Context. It has been suggested that the bow shocks of runaway stars are sources of high-energy gamma rays (E > 100 MeV). Theoretical models predicting high-energy gamma-ray emission from these sources were followed by the first detection of non-thermal radio emission from the bow shock of BD+43$^deg$ 3654 and non-thermal X-ray emission from the bow shock of AE Aurigae. Aims. We perform the first systematic search for MeV and GeV emission from 27 bow shocks of runaway stars using data collected by the Large Area Telescope (LAT) onboard the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope (Fermi). Methods. We analysed 57 months of Fermi-LAT data at the positions of 27 bow shocks of runaway stars extracted from the Extensive stellar BOw Shock Survey catalogue (E-BOSS). A likelihood analysis was performed to search for gamma-ray emission that is not compatible with diffuse background or emission from neighbouring sources and that could be associated with the bow shocks. Results. None of the bow shock candidates is detected significantly in the Fermi-LAT energy range. We therefore present upper limits on the high-energy emission in the energy range from 100 MeV to 300 GeV for 27 bow shocks of runaway stars in four energy bands. For the three cases where models of the high-energy emission are published we compare our upper limits to the modelled spectra. Our limits exclude the model predictions for Zeta Ophiuchi by a factor $approx$ 5.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
