Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe efficiency of Anderson-Darling test with limited sample size: an application to Backtesting Counterparty Credit Risk internal model
160
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
This work presents a theoretical and empirical evaluation of Anderson-Darling test when the sample size is limited. The test can be applied in order to backtest the risk factors dynamics in the context of Counterparty Credit Risk modelling. We show the limits of such test when backtesting the distributions of an interest rate model over long time horizons and we propose a modified version of the test that is able to detect more efficiently an underestimation of the models volatility. Finally we provide an empirical application.
rate research
Read More
We introduce the general arbitrage-free valuation framework for counterparty risk adjustments in presence of bilateral default risk, including default of the investor. We illustrate the symmetry in the valuation and show that the adjustment involves a long position in a put option plus a short position in a call option, both with zero strike and written on the residual net value of the contract at the relevant default times. We allow for correlation between the default times of the investor, counterparty and underlying portfolio risk factors. We use arbitrage-free stochastic dynamical models. We then specialize our analysis to Credit Default Swaps (CDS) as underlying portfolio, generalizing the work of Brigo and Chourdakis (2008) [5] who deal with unilateral and asymmetric counterparty risk. We introduce stochastic intensity models and a trivariate copula function on the default times exponential variables to model default dependence. Similarly to [5], we find that both default correlation and credit spread volatilities have a relevant and structured impact on the adjustment. Differently from [5], the two parties will now agree on the credit valuation adjustment. We study a case involving British Airways, Lehman Brothers and Royal Dutch Shell, illustrating the bilateral adjustments in concrete crisis situations.
A new risk measure, the lambda value at risk (Lambda VaR), has been recently proposed from a theoretical point of view as a generalization of the value at risk (VaR). The Lambda VaR appears attractive for its potential ability to solve several problems of the VaR. In this paper we propose three nonparametric backtesting methodologies for the Lambda VaR which exploit different features. Two of these tests directly assess the correctness of the level of coverage predicted by the model. One of these tests is bilateral and provides an asymptotic result. A third test assess the accuracy of the Lambda VaR that depends on the choice of the P&L distribution. However, this test requires the storage of more information. Finally, we perform a backtesting exercise and we compare our results with the ones from Hitaj and Peri (2015)
We propose a novel credit default model that takes into account the impact of macroeconomic information and contagion effect on the defaults of obligors. We use a set-valued Markov chain to model the default process, which is the set of all defaulted obligors in the group. We obtain analytic characterizations for the default process, and use them to derive pricing formulas in explicit forms for synthetic collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). Furthermore, we use market data to calibrate the model and conduct numerical studies on the tranche spreads of CDOs. We find evidence to support that systematic default risk coupled with default contagion could have the leading component of the total default risk.
The use of CVA to cover credit risk is widely spread, but has its limitations. Namely, dealers face the problem of the illiquidity of instruments used for hedging it, hence forced to warehouse credit risk. As a result, dealers tend to offer a limited OTC derivatives market to highly risky counterparties. Consequently, those highly risky entities rarely have access to hedging services precisely when they need them most. In this paper we propose a method to overcome this limitation. We propose to extend the CVA risk-neutral framework to compute an initial margin (IM) specific to each counterparty, which depends on the credit quality of the entity at stake, transforming the effective credit rating of a given netting set to AAA, regardless of the credit rating of the counterparty. By transforming CVA requirement into IM ones, as proposed in this paper, an institution could rely on the existing mechanisms for posting and calling of IM, hence ensuring the operational viability of this new form of managing warehoused risk. The main difference with the currently standard framework is the creation of a Specific Initial Margin, that depends in the credit rating of the counterparty and the characteristics of the netting set in question. In this paper we propose a methodology for such transformation in a sound manner, and hence this method overcomes some of the limitations of the CVA framework.
Recent literature implements machine learning techniques to assess corporate credit rating based on financial statement reports. In this work, we analyze the performance of four neural network architectures (MLP, CNN, CNN2D, LSTM) in predicting corporate credit rating as issued by Standard and Poors. We analyze companies from the energy, financial and healthcare sectors in US. The goal of the analysis is to improve application of machine learning algorithms to credit assessment. To this end, we focus on three questions. First, we investigate if the algorithms perform better when using a selected subset of features, or if it is better to allow the algorithms to select features themselves. Second, is the temporal aspect inherent in financial data important for the results obtained by a machine learning algorithm? Third, is there a particular neural network architecture that consistently outperforms others with respect to input features, sectors and holdout set? We create several case studies to answer these questions and analyze the results using ANOVA and multiple comparison testing procedure.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
