Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userCombined estimation for multi-measurements of branching ratio
227
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
Xiao-Xia Liu
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
A maximum likelihood method is used to deal with the combined estimation of multi-measurements of a branching ratio, where each result can be presented as an upper limit. The joint likelihood function is constructed using observed spectra of all measurements and the combined estimate of the branching ratio is obtained by maximizing the joint likelihood function. The Bayesian credible interval, or upper limit of the combined branching ratio, is given in cases both with and without inclusion of systematic error.
rate research
Read More
A method to include multiplicative systematic uncertainties into branching ratio limits was proposed by M. Convery. That solution used approximations which are not necessarily valid. This note provides a solution without approximations and compares the results.
The approximate symmetry of the strong interactions under isospin transformations is among the most precise tools available to control hadronic matrix elements. It is crucial in extracting fundamental parameters, but also provides avenues for the search of phenomena beyond the Standard Model. The precision of the resulting predictions requires special care when determining the quantities they are to be tested with. Specifically, in the extraction of branching ratios often isospin symmetry is assumed at one point or another implicitly, implying a significant bias for precision analyses. We extract a bias-free value for the production asymmetry between charged and neutral $B$ meson pairs at $B$ factories and discuss its consequences for the determination of branching fractions generally, and isospin-violating observables like the rate asymmetries in B -> J/psi K or B -> K* gamma decays specifically.
texttt{GooStats} is a software framework that provides a flexible environment and common tools to implement multi-variate statistical analysis. The framework is built upon the texttt{CERN ROOT}, texttt{MINUIT} and texttt{GooFit} packages. Running a multi-variate analysis in parallel on graphics processing units yields a huge boost in performance and opens new possibilities. The design and benchmark of texttt{GooStats} are presented in this article along with illustration of its application to statistical problems.
Signal estimation in the presence of background noise is a common problem in several scientific disciplines. An On/Off measurement is performed when the background itself is not known, being estimated from a background control sample. The frequentist and Bayesian approaches for signal estimation in On/Off measurements are reviewed and compared, focusing on the weakness of the former and on the advantages of the latter in correctly addressing the Poissonian nature of the problem. In this work, we devise a novel reconstruction method, dubbed BASiL (Bayesian Analysis including Single-event Likelihoods), for estimating the signal rate based on the Bayesian formalism. It uses information on event-by-event individual parameters and their distribution for the signal and background population. Events are thereby weighted according to their likelihood of being a signal or a background event and background suppression can be achieved without performing fixed fiducial cuts. Throughout the work, we maintain a general notation, that allows to apply the method generically, and provide a performance test using real data and simulations of observations with the MAGIC telescopes, as demonstration of the performance for Cherenkov telescopes. BASiL allows to estimate the signal more precisely, avoiding loss of exposure due to signal extraction cuts. We expect its applicability to be straightforward in similar cases.
The suitability of a mathematical-model Y = f({Xi}) in serving a purpose whatsoever (should be preset by the function f specific input-to-output variation-rates, i.e.) can be judged beforehand. We thus evaluate here the two apparently similar models: YA = fA(SRi,WRi) = (SRi/WRi) and: YD = fd(SRi,WRi) = ([SRi,WRi] - 1) = (YA - 1), with SRi and WRi representing certain measurable-variables (e.g. the sample S and the working-lab-reference W specific ith-isotopic-abundance-ratios, respectively, for a case as the isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS)). The idea is to ascertain whether fD should represent a better model than fA, specifically, for the well-known IRMS evaluation. The study clarifies that fA and fD should really represent different model-families. For example, the possible variation, eA, of an absolute estimate as the yA (and/ or the risk of running a machine on the basis of the measurement-model fA) should be dictated by the possible Ri-measurement-variations (u_S and u_W) only: eA = (u_S + u_W); i.e., at worst: eA = 2ui. However, the variation, eD, of the corresponding differential (i.e. YD) estimate yd should largely be decided by SRi and WRi values: ed = 2(|m_i |x u_i) = (|m_i | x eA); with: mi = (SRi/[SRi - WRi]). Thus, any IRMS measurement (i.e. for which |SRi - WRi| is nearly zero is a requirement) should signify that |mi| tends to infinity. Clearly, yD should be less accurate than yA, and/ or even turn out to be highly erroneous (eD tends to infinity). Nevertheless, the evaluation as the absolute yA, and hence as the sample isotopic ratio Sri, is shown to be equivalent to our previously reported finding that the conversion of a D-estimate (here, yD) into Sri should help to improve the achievable output-accuracy and -comparability.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
