We study a non-archimedean (NA) version of transportation problems and introduce naturally arising ultra-norms which we call Kantorovich ultra-norms. For every ultra-metric space and every NA valued field (e.g., the field $mathbb Q_{p}$ of $p$-adic numbers) the naturally defined inf-max cost formula achieves its infimum. We also present
In an earlier paper (A. N. Kochubei, {it Pacif. J. Math.} 269 (2014), 355--369), the author considered a restriction of Vladimirovs fractional differentiation operator $D^alpha$, $alpha >0$, to radial functions on a non-Archimedean field. In particular, it was found to possess such a right inverse $I^alpha$ that the appropriate change of variables reduces equations with $D^alpha$ (for radial functions) to integral equations whose properties resemble those of classical Volterra equations. In other words, we found, in the framework of non-Archimedean pseudo-differential operators, a counterpart of ordinary differential equations. In the present paper, we begin an operator-theoretic investigation of the operator $I^alpha$, and study a related analog of the Laplace transform.
Let $D^alpha, alpha>0$, be the Vladimirov-Taibleson fractional differentiation operator acting on complex-valued functions on a non-Archimedean local field. The identity $D^alpha D^{-alpha}f=f$ was known only for the case where $f$ has a compact support. Following a result by Samko about the fractional Laplacian of real analysis, we extend the above identity in terms of $L^p$-convergence of truncated integrals. Differences between real and non-Archimedean cases are discussed.
Enflo constructed a countable metric space that may not be uniformly embedded into any metric space of positive generalized roundness. Dranishnikov, Gong, Lafforgue and Yu modified Enflos example to construct a locally finite metric space that may not be coarsely embedded into any Hilbert space. In this paper we meld these two examples into one simpler construction. The outcome is a locally finite metric space $(mathfrak{Z}, zeta)$ which is strongly non embeddable in the sense that it may not be embedded uniformly or coarsely into any metric space of non zero generalized roundness. Moreover, we show that both types of embedding may be obstructed by a common recursive principle. It follows from our construction that any metric space which is Lipschitz universal for all locally finite metric spaces may not be embedded uniformly or coarsely into any metric space of non zero generalized roundness. Our construction is then adapted to show that the group $mathbb{Z}_omega=bigoplus_{aleph_0}mathbb{Z}$ admits a Cayley graph which may not be coarsely embedded into any metric space of non zero generalized roundness. Finally, for each $p geq 0$ and each locally finite metric space $(Z,d)$, we prove the existence of a Lipschitz injection $f : Z to ell_{p}$.
This article is the natural continuation of the paper: Mukhammadiev A.~et al Supremum, infimum and hyperlimits of Colombeau generalized numbers in this journal. Since the ring $tilde{R}$ of Robinson-Colombeau is non-Archimedean, a classical series $sum_{n=0}^{+infty}a_{n}$ of generalized numbers $a_{n}intilde{R}$ is convergent if and only if $a_{n}to0$ in the sharp topology. Therefore, this property does not permit us to generalize several classical results, mainly in the study of analytic generalized functions (as well as, e.g., in the study of sigma-additivity in integration of generalized functions). Introducing the notion of hyperseries, we solve this problem recovering classical examples of analytic functions as well as several classical results.
In this article, we analyse the Kantorovich type exponential sampling operators and its linear combination. We derive the Voronovskaya type theorem and its quantitative estimates for these operators in terms of an appropriate K-functional. Further, we improve the order of approximation by using the convex type linear combinations of these operators. Subsequently, we prove the estimates concerning the order of convergence for these linear combinations. Finally, we give some examples of kernels along with the graphical representations.