Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userLearning Mixed Membership Mallows Models from Pairwise Comparisons
129
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We propose a novel parameterized family of Mixed Membership Mallows Models (M4) to account for variability in pairwise comparisons generated by a heterogeneous population of noisy and inconsistent users. M4 models individual preferences as a user-specific probabilistic mixture of shared latent Mallows components. Our key algorithmic insight for estimation is to establish a statistical connection between M4 and topic models by viewing pairwise comparisons as words, and users as documents. This key insight leads us to explore Mallows components with a separable structure and leverage recent advances in separable topic discovery. While separability appears to be overly restrictive, we nevertheless show that it is an inevitable outcome of a relatively small number of latent Mallows components in a world of large number of items. We then develop an algorithm based on robust extreme-point identification of convex polygons to learn the reference rankings, and is provably consistent with polynomial sample complexity guarantees. We demonstrate that our new model is empirically competitive with the current state-of-the-art approaches in predicting real-world preferences.
rate research
Read More
To alleviate the data requirement for training effective binary classifiers in binary classification, many weakly supervised learning settings have been proposed. Among them, some consider using pairwise but not pointwise labels, when pointwise labels are not accessible due to privacy, confidentiality, or security reasons. However, as a pairwise label denotes whether or not two data points share a pointwise label, it cannot be easily collected if either point is equally likely to be positive or negative. Thus, in this paper, we propose a novel setting called pairwise comparison (Pcomp) classification, where we have only pairs of unlabeled data that we know one is more likely to be positive than the other. Firstly, we give a Pcomp data generation process, derive an unbiased risk estimator (URE) with theoretical guarantee, and further improve URE using correction functions. Secondly, we link Pcomp classification to noisy-label learning to develop a progressive URE and improve it by imposing consistency regularization. Finally, we demonstrate by experiments the effectiveness of our methods, which suggests Pcomp is a valuable and practically useful type of pairwise supervision besides the pairwise label.
We consider the problem of ranking $n$ players from partial pairwise comparison data under the Bradley-Terry-Luce model. For the first time in the literature, the minimax rate of this ranking problem is derived with respect to the Kendalls tau distance that measures the difference between two rank vectors by counting the number of
Recent work by Locatello et al. (2018) has shown that an inductive bias is required to disentangle factors of interest in Variational Autoencoder (VAE). Motivated by a real-world problem, we propose a setting where such bias is introduced by providing pairwise ordinal comparisons between instances, based on the desired factor to be disentangled. For example, a doctor compares pairs of patients based on the level of severity of their illnesses, and the desired factor is a quantitive level of the disease severity. In a real-world application, the pairwise comparisons are usually noisy. Our method, Robust Ordinal VAE (ROVAE), incorporates the noisy pairwise ordinal comparisons in the disentanglement task. We introduce non-negative random variables in ROVAE, such that it can automatically determine whether each pairwise ordinal comparison is trustworthy and ignore the noisy comparisons. Experimental results demonstrate that ROVAE outperforms existing methods and is more robust to noisy pairwise comparisons in both benchmark datasets and a real-world application.
As pairwise ranking becomes broadly employed for elections, sports competitions, recommendations, and so on, attackers have strong motivation and incentives to manipulate the ranking list. They could inject malicious comparisons into the training data to fool the victim. Such a technique is called poisoning attack in regression and classification tasks. In this paper, to the best of our knowledge, we initiate the first systematic investigation of data poisoning attacks on pairwise ranking algorithms, which can be formalized as the dynamic and static games between the ranker and the attacker and can be modeled as certain kinds of integer programming problems. To break the computational hurdle of the underlying integer programming problems, we reformulate them into the distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problems, which are computationally tractable. Based on such DRO formulations, we propose two efficient poisoning attack algorithms and establish the associated theoretical guarantees. The effectiveness of the suggested poisoning attack strategies is demonstrated by a series of toy simulations and several real data experiments. These experimental results show that the proposed methods can significantly reduce the performance of the ranker in the sense that the correlation between the true ranking list and the aggregated results can be decreased dramatically.
Mixed-SCORE is a recent approach for mixed membership community detection proposed by Jin et al. (2017) which is an extension of SCORE (Jin, 2015). In the note Jin et al. (2018), the authors propose SCORE+ as an improvement of SCORE to handle with weak signal networks. In this paper, we propose a method called Mixed-SCORE+ designed based on the Mixed-SCORE and SCORE+, therefore Mixed-SCORE+ inherits nice properties of both Mixed-SCORE and SCORE+. In the proposed method, we consider K+1 eigenvectors when there are K communities to detect weak signal networks. And we also construct vertices hunting and membership reconstruction steps to solve the problem of mixed membership community detection. Compared with several benchmark methods, numerical results show that Mixed-SCORE+ provides a significant improvement on the Polblogs network and two weak signal networks Simmons and Caltech, with error rates 54/1222, 125/1137 and 94/590, respectively. Furthermore, Mixed-SCORE+ enjoys excellent performances on the SNAP ego-networks.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
