Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userA prompt extra component in the high energy spectrum of GRB 131108A
141
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The high-fluence GRB131108A at redshift z=2.4, was detected by the Mini-Calorimeter (MCAL, 0.35-100 MeV) and the Gamma- Ray Imaging Detector (GRID, 30 MeV - 30 GeV) onboard the AGILE satellite. The burst emission consisted of a very bright initial peak,lasting 0.1 s, followed by a fainter emission detected for ~25 s with the MCAL and ~80 s with the GRID. The AGILE spectra, when compared with those reported at lower energies, indicate the presence of a prominent high-energy component with peak energy in the 10-20 MeV region. Contrary to other GRBs, this high-energy component is present also during the initial peak, with power law photon index of about -1.6 below 10 MeV and -2.35+-0.2 above 30 MeV.
rate research
Read More
Using a detailed model of the internal shock phase, we discuss the origin of the prompt emission in gamma-ray bursts. We focus on the identification of the dominant radiative process (Fermi-GBM range) and propose an explanation for some features observed by Fermi-LAT at high energy in some GRB lightcurves.
Observations of GRB 100724B with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) find that the spectrum is dominated by the typical Band functional form, which is usually taken to represent a non-thermal emission component, but also includes a statistically highly significant thermal spectral contribution. The simultaneous observation of the thermal and non-thermal components allows us to confidently identify the two emission components. The fact that these seem to vary independently favors the idea that the thermal component is of photospheric origin while the dominant non-thermal emission occurs at larger radii. Our results imply either a very high efficiency for the non-thermal process, or a very small size of the region at the base of the flow, both quite challenging for the standard fireball model. These problems are resolved if the jet is initially highly magnetized and has a substantial Poynting flux.
The VHE component from at least two GRBs, i.e., GRB180720B and GRB190114C, has been detected in the afterglow phase. We systematically analyzed 199 GRBs detected by Fermi-LAT during 2008-2019. If an additional high-energy component exists in the afterglows of Fermi-LAT GRBs, the best-fit spectral model could be a broken power-law (BPL) model with an upturn above a break energy. We compare the afterglow spectra using PL and BPL representations. Out of the 30 GRBs with >10GeV photons that arrived after T90, 25 GRBs are tentatively or significantly detected at 0.1-200 GeV after 2*T90. The spectrum of GRB131231A shows an upturn above a break of 1.6+-0.8~GeV, supporting the BPL model. For GRB131231A, we performed a modeling of its X-ray and gamma-ray spectra, and found that the SSC model can explain the upturn with acceptable parameter values. In the cases of GRBs 190114C, 171210A, 150902A, 130907A, 130427A, and 090902B, the improvement of the BPL fit compared to the PL fit is tentative or marginal. There is no conclusive evidence that an additional higher energy component commonly exists in Fermi-LAT GRB afterglows, except for a group of Fermi-LAT GRBs mentioned above. Such an additional high-energy component may be explained by the synchrotron self-Compton mechanism. Current and future VHE observations will provide important constraints on the issue.
Synchrotron radiation mechanism, when electrons are accelerated in a relativistic shock, is known to have serious problems to explain the observed gamma-ray spectrum below the peak for most Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs); the synchrotron spectrum below the peak is much softer than observed spectra. Recently, the possibility that electrons responsible for the radiation cool via Inverse Compton, but in the Klein-Nishina regime, has been proposed as a solution to this problem. We provide an analytical study of this effect and show that it leads to a hardening of the low energy spectrum but not by enough to make it consistent with the observed spectra for most GRBs (this is assuming that electrons are injected continuously over a time scale comparable to the dynamical time scale, as is expected for internal shocks of GRBs). In particular, we find that it is not possible to obtain a spectrum with alpha>-0.1 (f_{ u} propto u^{alpha}) whereas the typical observed value is alphasim0. Moreover, extreme values for a number of parameters are required in order that alphasim-0.1: the energy fraction in magnetic field needs to be less than about 10^{-4}, the thermal Lorentz factor of electrons should be larger than 10^6, and the radius where gamma-rays are produced should be not too far away from the deceleration radius. These difficulties suggest that the synchrotron radiation mechanism in internal shocks does not provide a self-consistent solution when alpha>-0.2.
We present the high-energy emission properties of GRB 160509A, from its prompt mission to late afterglow phase. GRB 160509A contains two emission episodes: 0-40s and 280-420s after the burst onset (t0). The relatively high fluence of GRB 160509A allows us to establish an evolving spectrum above 100 MeV. During the first emission episode, the >100 MeV spectrum is soft with Gamma=>3.0, which can be smoothly connected to keV energies with a Band function with a high-energy cutoff. The >100 MeV spectrum rapidly changes to a hard spectrum with Gamma<=1.5 after t0+40s. The existence of very energetic photons, e.g., a 52 GeV that arrives t0+77 seconds, and a 29 GeV that arrives t0+70 ks, is hard to reconcile by the synchrotron emission from forward-shock electrons, but likely due to inverse Compton mechanism (e.g., synchrotron self-Compton emission). A soft spectrum (Gamma~2) between 300s and 1000s after the burst onset is also found at a significance of about 2 standard deviations, which suggests a different emission mechanism at work for this short period of time. GRB 160509A represents the latest example where inverse Compton emission has to be taken into account in explaining the afterglow GeV emission, which had been suggested long before the launch of Fermi LAT.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
