Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userCalibration and partial calibration on principal components when the number of auxiliary variables is large
167
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Camelia Goga
Publication date
2014
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
In survey sampling, calibration is a very popular tool used to make total estimators consistent with known totals of auxiliary variables and to reduce variance. When the number of auxiliary variables is large, calibration on all the variables may lead to estimators of totals whose mean squared error (MSE) is larger than the MSE of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator even if this simple estimator does not take account of the available auxiliary information. We study in this paper a new technique based on dimension reduction through principal components that can be useful in this large dimension context. Calibration is performed on the first principal components, which can be viewed as the synthetic variables containing the most important part of the variability of the auxiliary variables. When some auxiliary variables play a more important role than the others, the method can be adapted to provide an exact calibration on these important variables. Some asymptotic properties are given in which the number of variables is allowed to tend to infinity with the population size. A data driven selection criterion of the number of principal components ensuring that all the sampling weights remain positive is discussed. The methodology of the paper is illustrated, in a multipurpose context, by an application to the estimation of electricity consumption for each day of a week with the help of 336 auxiliary variables consisting of the past consumption measured every half an hour over the previous week.
rate research
Read More
In causal inference, principal stratification is a framework for dealing with a posttreatment intermediate variable between a treatment and an outcome, in which the principal strata are defined by the joint potential values of the intermediate variable. Because the principal strata are not fully observable, the causal effects within them, also known as the principal causal effects, are not identifiable without additional assumptions. Several previous empirical studies leveraged auxiliary variables to improve the inference of principal causal effects. We establish a general theory for identification and estimation of the principal causal effects with auxiliary variables, which provides a solid foundation for statistical inference and more insights for model building in empirical research. In particular, we consider two commonly-used strategies for principal stratification problems: principal ignorability, and the conditional independence between the auxiliary variable and the outcome given principal strata and covariates. For these two strategies, we give non-parametric and semi-parametric identification results without modeling assumptions on the outcome. When the assumptions for neither strategies are plausible, we propose a large class of flexible parametric and semi-parametric models for identifying principal causal effects. Our theory not only establishes formal identification results of several models that have been used in previous empirical studies but also generalizes them to allow for different types of outcomes and intermediate variables.
We present a new functional Bayes classifier that uses principal component (PC) or partial least squares (PLS) scores from the common covariance function, that is, the covariance function marginalized over groups. When the groups have different covariance functions, the PC or PLS scores need not be independent or even uncorrelated. We use copulas to model the dependence. Our method is semiparametric; the marginal densities are estimated nonparametrically by kernel smoothing and the copula is modeled parametrically. We focus on Gaussian and t-copulas, but other copulas could be used. The strong performance of our methodology is demonstrated through simulation, real data examples, and asymptotic properties.
In many machine learning applications, it is important for the model to provide confidence scores that accurately captures its prediction uncertainty. Although modern learning methods have achieved great success in predictive accuracy, generating calibrated confidence scores remains a major challenge. Mixup, a popular yet simple data augmentation technique based on taking convex combinations of pairs of training examples, has been empirically found to significantly improve confidence calibration across diverse applications. However, when and how Mixup helps calibration is still mysterious. In this paper, we theoretically prove that Mixup improves calibration in textit{high-dimensional} settings by investigating two natural data models on classification and regression. Interestingly, the calibration benefit of Mixup increases as the model capacity increases. We support our theories with experiments on common architectures and data sets. In addition, we study how Mixup improves calibration in semi-supervised learning. While incorporating unlabeled data can sometimes make the model less calibrated, adding Mixup training mitigates this issue and provably improves calibration. Our analysis provides new insights and a framework to understand Mixup and calibration.
We study least squares linear regression over $N$ uncorrelated Gaussian features that are selected in order of decreasing variance. When the number of selected features $p$ is at most the sample size $n$, the estimator under consideration coincides with the principal component regression estimator; when $p>n$, the estimator is the least $ell_2$ norm solution over the selected features. We give an average-case analysis of the out-of-sample prediction error as $p,n,N to infty$ with $p/N to alpha$ and $n/N to beta$, for some constants $alpha in [0,1]$ and $beta in (0,1)$. In this average-case setting, the prediction error exhibits a double descent shape as a function of $p$. We also establish conditions under which the minimum risk is achieved in the interpolating ($p>n$) regime.
In this paper, we extend graph-based identification methods by allowing background knowledge in the form of non-zero parameter values. Such information could be obtained, for example, from a previously conducted randomized experiment, from substantive understanding of the domain, or even an identification technique. To incorporate such information systematically, we propose the addition of auxiliary variables to the model, which are constructed so that certain paths will be conveniently cancelled. This cancellation allows the auxiliary variables to help conventional methods of identification (e.g., single-door criterion, instrumental variables, half-trek criterion), as well as model testing (e.g., d-separation, over-identification). Moreover, by iteratively alternating steps of identification and adding auxiliary variables, we can improve the power of existing identification methods via a bootstrapping approach that does not require external knowledge. We operationalize this method for simple instrumental sets (a generalization of instrumental variables) and show that the resulting method is able to identify at least as many models as the most general identification method for linear systems known to date. We further discuss the application of auxiliary variables to the tasks of model testing and z-identification.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
