Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userComparing Model Selection and Regularization Approaches to Variable Selection in Model-Based Clustering
215
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Cathy Maugis
Publication date
2013
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We compare two major approaches to variable selection in clustering: model selection and regularization. Based on previous results, we select the method of Maugis et al. (2009b), which modified the method of Raftery and Dean (2006), as a current state of the art model selection method. We select the method of Witten and Tibshirani (2010) as a current state of the art regularization method. We compared the methods by simulation in terms of their accuracy in both classification and variable selection. In the first simulation experiment all the variables were conditionally independent given cluster membership. We found that variable selection (of either kind) yielded substantial gains in classification accuracy when the clusters were well separated, but few gains when the clusters were close together. We found that the two variable selection methods had comparable classification accuracy, but that the model selection approach had substantially better accuracy in selecting variables. In our second simulation experiment, there were correlations among the variables given the cluster memberships. We found that the model selection approach was substantially more accurate in terms of both classification and variable selection than the regularization approach, and that both gave more accurate classifications than $K$-means without variable selection.
rate research
Read More
Relevant methods of variable selection have been proposed in model-based clustering and classification. These methods are making use of backward or forward procedures to define the roles of the variables. Unfortunately, these stepwise procedures are terribly slow and make these variable selection algorithms inefficient to treat large data sets. In this paper, an alternative regularization approach of variable selection is proposed for model-based clustering and classification. In this approach, the variables are first ranked with a lasso-like procedure in order to avoid painfully slow stepwise algorithms. Thus, the variable selection methodology of Maugis et al (2009b) can be efficiently applied on high-dimensional data sets.
Model selection is a fundamental part of the applied Bayesian statistical methodology. Metrics such as the Akaike Information Criterion are commonly used in practice to select models but do not incorporate the uncertainty of the models parameters and can give misleading choices. One approach that uses the full posterior distribution is to compute the ratio of two models normalising constants, known as the Bayes factor. Often in realistic problems, this involves the integration of analytically intractable, high-dimensional distributions, and therefore requires the use of stochastic methods such as thermodynamic integration (TI). In this paper we apply a variation of the TI method, referred to as referenced TI, which computes a single models normalising constant in an efficient way by using a judiciously chosen reference density. The advantages of the approach and theoretical considerations are set out, along with explicit pedagogical 1 and 2D examples. Benchmarking is presented with comparable methods and we find favourable convergence performance. The approach is shown to be useful in practice when applied to a real problem - to perform model selection for a semi-mechanistic hierarchical Bayesian model of COVID-19 transmission in South Korea involving the integration of a 200D density.
For nearly any challenging scientific problem evaluation of the likelihood is problematic if not impossible. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) allows us to employ the whole Bayesian formalism to problems where we can use simulations from a model, but cannot evaluate the likelihood directly. When summary statistics of real and simulated data are compared --- rather than the data directly --- information is lost, unless the summary statistics are sufficient. Here we employ an information-theoretical framework that can be used to construct (approximately) sufficient statistics by combining different statistics until the loss of information is minimized. Such sufficient sets of statistics are constructed for both parameter estimation and model selection problems. We apply our approach to a range of illustrative and real-world model selection problems.
With the rapid advance of the Internet, search engines (e.g., Google, Bing, Yahoo!) are used by billions of users for each day. The main function of a search engine is to locate the most relevant webpages corresponding to what the user requests. This report focuses on the core problem of information retrieval: how to learn the relevance between a document (very often webpage) and a query given by user. Our analysis consists of two parts: 1) we use standard statistical methods to select important features among 137 candidates given by information retrieval researchers from Microsoft. We find that not all the features are useful, and give interpretations on the top-selected features; 2) we give baselines on prediction over the real-world dataset MSLR-WEB by using various learning algorithms. We find that models of boosting trees, random forest in general achieve the best performance of prediction. This agrees with the mainstream opinion in information retrieval community that tree-based algorithms outperform the other candidates for this problem.
We present a new variable selection method based on model-based gradient boosting and randomly permuted variables. Model-based boosting is a tool to fit a statistical model while performing variable selection at the same time. A drawback of the fitting lies in the need of multiple model fits on slightly altered data (e.g. cross-validation or bootstrap) to find the optimal number of boosting iterations and prevent overfitting. In our proposed approach, we augment the data set with randomly permut
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
