Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userHow to Complete the Description of Physical Reality by Non-local Hidden Variables?
111
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
Timur F. Kamalov
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Which non-local hidden variables could complement the description of physical reality? The present model of extended Newtonian dynamics (MEND) is generalize but not alternative to Newtonian Dynamics because its extended Newtonian Dynamics to arbitrary reference frames. It Is Physics of Arbitrary Reference Frames. Generalize and alternative is not the same. MEND describes the dynamics of mechanical systems for arbitrary reference frames and not only for inertial reference frames as Newtonian Dynamics. Newtonian Dynamics can describe non-inertial reference frames as well introducing fiction forces. In MEND we have fiction forces naturally and automatically from new axiomatic and we neednt have inertial reference frame. MEND is differs from Newtonian Dynamics in the case of micro-objects description.
rate research
Read More
Newtonian physics is describes macro-objects sufficiently well, however it does not describe microobjects. A model of Extended Mechanics for Quantum Theory is based on an axiomatic generalization of Newtonian classical laws to arbitrary reference frames postulating the description of body dynamics by differential equations with higher derivatives of coordinates with respect to time but not only of second order ones and follows from Mach principle. In that case the Lagrangian $L(t,q,dot{q},ddot{q},...,dot {q}^{(n)},...)$ depends on higher derivatives of coordinates with respect to time. The kinematic state of a body is considered to be defined if n-th derivative of the body coordinate with respect to time is a constant (i.e. finite). First, kinematic state of a free body is postulated to invariable in an arbitrary reference frame. Second, if the kinematic invariant of the reference frame is the n-th order derivative of coordinate with respect to time, then the body dynamics is describes by a 2n-th order differential equation. For example, in a uniformly accelerated reference frame all free particles have the same acceleration equal to the reference frame invariant, i.e. reference frame acceleration. These bodies are described by third-order differential equation in a uniformly accelerated reference frame.
A hidden variables model complying with the simplest form of Local Realism was recently introduced, which reproduces Quantum Mechanics predictions for an even ideally perfect Bells experiment. This is possible thanks to the use of a non-Boolean vector hidden variable. Yet, that model is as far as Quantum Mechanics from the goal of providing a complete description of physical reality in the EPR-sense. Such complete description includes the capacity to calculate, from the values taken by the hidden variables, the time values when particles are detected. This can be achieved by replacing Borns rule (which allow calculating only probabilities) with a deterministic condition for particle detection. The simplest choice is a threshold condition on the hidden variables. However, in order to test this choice, a new type of quantum (or wave, or non-Boolean) computer is necessary. This new type of quantum computer does not exist yet, not even in theory. In this paper, a classical (Boolean) computer code is presented which mimics the operation of that new type of quantum computer by using contextual instructions. These instructions take into account a consequence of the principle of superposition (which is a typical vector, i.e. non-Boolean, feature). Numerical results generated by the mimicking code are analyzed. They illustrate the features the hypothetical new type of quantum computers output may have, and show how and why some intuitive assumptions about Bells experiment fail.
We present a theoretical model which allows to keep track of all photons in an interferometer. The model is implemented in a numerical scheme, and we simulate photon interference measurements on one, two, four, and eight slits. Measurements are simulated for the high intensity regime, where we show that our simulations describe all experimental results so far. With a slightly modified concept we can also model interference experiments in the low intensity regime, these experiments have recently been performed with single molecules. Finally, we predict the result of polarization measurements, which allow to check the model experimentally.
Unperformed measurements have no results. Unobserved results can affect future measurements.
We simulate correlation measurements of entangled photons numerically. The model employed is strictly local. In our model correlations arise from a phase, connecting the electromagnetic fields of the two photons at their separate points of measurement. We sum up coincidences for each pair individually and model the operation of a polarizer beam splitter numerically. The results thus obtained differ substantially from the classical results. In addition, we analyze the effects of decoherence and non-ideal beam splitters. It is shown that under realistic experimental conditions the Bell inequalities are violated by more than 30 standard deviations.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
