Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userTwenty Digits of Some Integrals of the Prime Zeta Function
142
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
Richard J. Mathar
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The double sum sum_(s >= 1) sum_p 1/(p^s log p^s) = 2.00666645... over the inverse of the product of prime powers p^s and their logarithms, is computed to 24 decimal digits. The sum covers all primes p and all integer exponents s>=1. The calculational strategy is adopted from Cohens work which basically looks at the fraction as the underivative of the Prime Zeta Function, and then evaluates the integral by numerical methods.
rate research
Read More
A recent paper by Agelas [Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, 2019, hal-00747680v3] claims to prove the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis (GRH) and, as a special case, the Riemann Hypothesis (RH). We show that the proof given by Agelas contains an error. In particular, Lemma 2.3 of Agelas is false. This Lemma 2.3 is a generalisation of Theorem 1 of Vassilev-Missana [A note on prime zeta function and Riemann zeta function, Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics, 22, 4 (2016), 12-15]. We show by several independent methods that Theorem 1 of Vassilev-Missana is false. We also show that Theorem 2 of Vassilev-Missana is false. This note has two aims. The first aim is to alert other researchers to these errors so they do not rely on faulty results in their own work. The second aim is pedagogical - we hope to show how these errors could have been detected earlier, which may suggest how similar errors can be avoided, or at least detected at an early stage.
Let $eta$ be the weight $1/2$ Dedekind function. A unification and generalization of the integrals $int_0^infty f(x)eta^n(ix)dx$, $n=1,3$, of Glasser cite{glasser2009} is presented. Simple integral inequalities as well as some $n=2$, $4$, $6$, $8$, $9$, and $14$ examples are also given. A prominent result is that $$int_0^infty eta^6 (ix)dx= int_0^infty xeta^6 (ix)dx ={1 over {8pi}}left({{Gamma(1/4)} over {Gamma(3/4)}}right)^2,$$ where $Gamma$ is the Gamma function. The integral $int_0^1 x^{-1} ln x ~eta(ix)dx$ is evaluated in terms of a reducible difference of pairs of the first Stieltjes constant $gamma_1(a)$.
We make explicit an argument of Heath-Brown concerning large and small gaps between nontrivial zeroes of the Riemann zeta-function, $zeta(s)$. In particular, we provide the first unconditional results on gaps (large and small) which hold for a positive proportion of zeroes. To do this we prove explicit bounds on the second and fourth power moments of $S(t+h)-S(t)$, where $S(t)$ denotes the argument of $zeta(s)$ on the critical line and $h ll 1 / log T$. We also use these moments to prove explicit results on the density of the nontrivial zeroes of $zeta(s)$ of a given multiplicity.
We present several formulae for the large $t$ asymptotics of the Riemann zeta function $zeta(s)$, $s=sigma+i t$, $0leq sigma leq 1$, $t>0$, which are valid to all orders. A particular case of these results coincides with the classical results of Siegel. Using these formulae, we derive explicit representations for the sum $sum_a^b n^{-s}$ for certain ranges of $a$ and $b$. In addition, we present precise estimates relating this sum with the sum $sum_c^d n^{s-1}$ for certain ranges of $a, b, c, d$. We also study a two-parameter generalization of the Riemann zeta function which we denote by $Phi(u,v,beta)$, $uin mathbb{C}$, $vin mathbb{C}$, $beta in mathbb{R}$. Generalizing the methodology used in the study of $zeta(s)$, we derive asymptotic formulae for $Phi(u,v,beta)$.
This is a review of some of the interesting properties of the Riemann Zeta Function.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
