Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userEvidence against non-cosmological redshifts of QSOs in SDSS data
98
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
In the unusual intrinsic QSO redshift models, QSOs are ejected by active galaxies with periodic non-cosmological reshifts, thus QSOs are generally associated with active galaxies, and certain structures will be revealed in the QSO redshift distribution. As the largest homogeneous sample of QSOs and galaxies, SDSS data provide the best opportunity to examine this issue. We review the debates on this issue, focused on those based on SDSS and 2dF data, and conclude that there is no strong connection between foreground active galaxies and high-redshift QSOs. The existence of two dips in the SDSS QSO redshift distribution at z=2.7 and 3.5 has recently re-ignited those controversial debates on the origin of QSO redshift. It also turned out that both dips are totally caused by selection effects and after selection effects have been corrected, the two dips disappear and no structure in the redshift distribution of SDSS DR5 sample. These results support that the reshifts of QSOs are cosmological.
rate research
Read More
A preliminary analysis of fields around 20 mainly radio-quiet QSOs (RQQs) at intermediate redshift is summarized. We find overdensities of faint sources around 50% of our observed QSOs suggesting that they are located in groups or even clusters of galaxies.
We discuss selection of QSO candidates from the combined SDSS and GALEX catalogues. We discuss properties of QSOs within the combined sample, and note uncertainties in number counts and completeness, compared with other SDSS-based samples. We discuss colour and other properties with redshift within the sample and the SEDs for subsets. We estimate the numbers of faint QSOs that are classified as extended objects in the SDSS, and consequent uncertainties that follow.
Even though SN 2012cg is one of the best-studied Type Ia Supernovae to date, the nature of its progenitor system has been debated in numerous studies. Specifically, it is difficult to reconcile recent claims of the detection of a $sim 6 rm{M}_odot$ main-sequence companion with recent deep, late-time H$alpha{}$ flux limits. In this study we add three new constraints: 1) We analyze new high-signal-to-noise, nebular-phase, LBT/MODS spectrum of SN 2012cg and place an upper limit on the amount of low-velocity, solar-abundance material removed from a possible companion of $ < 7.8 times 10^{-3} rm{M}_odot$. 2) We use Swift X-ray observations to constrain the preexplosion mass-loss rate to be $dot M<10^{-6},$ $rm{M}_odot$ yr$^{-1}$ for $v_textrm{w}=100,rm{km,s^{-1}}$. 3) We carefully reanalyze a prediscovery MASTER image and, with published light curves of SN 2012cg, we estimate the time of first light and conservatively constrain the radius of a Roche-lobe overflowing companion to be $< 0.24 rm{R}_odot$. These observations disagree with a large nearby companion, and, when considered with other studies of SN 2012cgs progenitor system, essentially rule out a non-degenerate companion.
[abridged] Quasars (QSOs) at the highest known redshift (z~6) are unique probes of the early growth of supermassive black holes (BHs). Until now, only the most luminous QSOs have been studied, often one object at a time. Here we present the most extensive consistent analysis to date of z>4 QSOs with observed NIR spectra, combining three new z~6 objects from our ongoing VLT-ISAAC program with nineteen 4<z<6.5 sources from the literature. The new sources extend the existing SDSS sample towards the faint end of the QSO luminosity function. Using a maximum likelihood fitting routine optimized for our spectral decomposition, we estimate the black hole mass (MBH), the Eddington ratio (defined as Lbol/LEdd) and the FeII/MgII line ratio, a proxy for the chemical abundance, to characterize both the central object and the broad line region gas. The QSOs in our sample host BHs with masses of ~10^9 Modot that are accreting close to the Eddington luminosity, consistent with earlier results. We find that the distribution of observed Eddington ratios is significantly different than that of a luminosity-matched comparison sample of SDSS QSOs at lower redshift (0.35<z<2.25): the average <log(Lbol/LEdd)>=-0.37 (Lbol/LEdd~0.43) with a scatter of 0.20 dex for the z>4 sample and the <log(Lbol/LEdd)>=-0.80 (Lbol/LEdd~0.16) with a scatter of 0.24 dex for the 0.35<z<2.25 sample. This implies that, at a given luminosity, the MBH at high-z is typically lower than the average MBH of the lower-redshift population, i.e. the z>4 sources are accreting significantly faster than the lower-redshift ones. We show that the derived FeII/MgII ratios depend sensitively on the performed analysis: our self-consistent, homogeneous analysis significantly reduces the FeII/MgII scatter found in previous studies. The measured FeII/MgII line ratios show no sign of evolution with cosmic time in the redshift range 4<z<6.5 [...]
We study a two-parameter extension of the cosmological standard model $Lambda$CDM in which cold dark matter interacts with a new form of dark radiation. The two parameters correspond to the energy density in the dark radiation fluid $Delta N_mathrm{fluid}$ and the interaction strength between dark matter and dark radiation. The interactions give rise to a very weak dark matter drag which damps the growth of matter density perturbations throughout radiation domination, allowing to reconcile the tension between predictions of large scale structure from the CMB and direct measurements of $sigma_8$. We perform a precision fit to Planck CMB data, BAO, large scale structure, and direct measurements of the expansion rate of the universe today. Our model lowers the $chi$-squared relative to $Lambda$CDM by about 12, corresponding to a preference for non-zero dark matter drag by more than $3 sigma$. Particle physics models which naturally produce a dark matter drag of the required form include the recently proposed non-Abelian dark matter model in which the dark radiation corresponds to massless dark gluons.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
