Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userAn omega-Power of a Finitary Language Which is a Borel Set of Infinite Rank
111
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Olivier Finkel
Publication date
2008
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Authors
Olivier Finkel
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Omega-powers of finitary languages are omega languages in the form V^omega, where V is a finitary language over a finite alphabet X. Since the set of infinite words over X can be equipped with the usual Cantor topology, the question of the topological complexity of omega-powers naturally arises and has been raised by Niwinski, by Simonnet, and by Staiger. It has been recently proved that for each integer n > 0, there exist some omega-powers of context free languages which are Pi^0_n-complete Borel sets, and that there exists a context free language L such that L^omega is analytic but not Borel. But the question was still open whether there exists a finitary language V such that V^omega is a Borel set of infinite rank. We answer this question in this paper, giving an example of a finitary language whose omega-power is Borel of infinite rank.
rate research
Read More
The $omega$-power of a finitary language L over a finite alphabet $Sigma$ is the language of infinite words over $Sigma$ defined by L $infty$ := {w 0 w 1. .. $in$ $Sigma$ $omega$ | $forall$i $in$ $omega$ w i $in$ L}. The $omega$-powers appear very naturally in Theoretical Computer Science in the characterization of several classes of languages of infinite words accepted by various kinds of automata, like B{u}chi automata or B{u}chi pushdown automata. We survey some recent results about the links relating Descriptive Set Theory and $omega$-powers.
Werners set-theoretical model is one of the simplest models of CIC. It combines a functional view of predicative universes with a collapsed view of the impredicative sort Prop. However this model of Prop is so coarse that the principle of excluded middle holds. Following our previous work, we interpret Prop into a topological space (a special case of Heyting algebra) to make the model more intuitionistic without sacrificing simplicity. We improve on that work by providing a full interpretation of dependent product types, using Alexandroff spaces. We also extend our approach to inductive types by adding support for lists.
We prove that, for any natural number n $ge$ 1, we can find a finite alphabet $Sigma$ and a finitary language L over $Sigma$ accepted by a one-counter automaton, such that the $omega$-power L $infty$ := {w 0 w 1. .. $in$ $Sigma$ $omega$ | $forall$i $in$ $omega$ w i $in$ L} is $Pi$ 0 n-complete. We prove a similar result for the class $Sigma$ 0 n .
We show that the set of absolutely normal numbers is $mathbf Pi^0_3$-complete in the Borel hierarchy of subsets of real numbers. Similarly, the set of absolutely normal numbers is $Pi^0_3$-complete in the effective Borel hierarchy.
Escalation in games is when agents keep playing forever. Based on formal proofs we claim that if agents assume that resource are infinite, escalation is rational.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
