ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
In a recent paper, S. Singh and K. Tankeshwar (ST), [Phys. Rev. E textbf{67}, 012201 (2003)], proposed a new interpretation of the collective dynamics in liquid metals, and, in particular, of the relaxation mechanisms ruling the density fluctuations propagation. At variance with both the predictions of the current literature and the results of recent Inelastic X-ray Scattering (IXS) experiments, ST associate the quasielastic component of the $S(Q,omega)$ to the thermal relaxation, as it holds in an ordinary adiabatic hydrodynamics valid for non-conductive liquids and in the $Q to 0$ limit. We show here that this interpretation leads to a non-physical behaviour of different thermodynamic and transport parameters.
We show, that the theoretical expression for the dispersion of collective excitations reported in [Phys. Rev. B {bf 103}, 099901 (2021)], at variance with what was claimed in the paper, does not account for the energy fluctuations and does not tend i
We show that the presented in Phys.Rev.B, v.101, 214312 (2020) theoretical expressions for longitudinal current spectral function $C^L(k,omega)$ and dispersion of collective excitations are not correct. Indeed, they are not compatible with the contin
The collective dynamics of liquid Gallium close to the melting point has been studied using Inelastic X-ray Scattering to probe lengthscales smaller than the size of the first coordination shell. %(momentum transfers, $Q$, $>$15 nm$^{-1}$). Although
The experimental results relevant for the understanding of the microscopic dynamics in liquid metals are reviewed, with special regards to the ones achieved in the last two decades. Inelastic Neutron Scattering played a major role since the developme
Reply to the Comment by L. Berthier and J.-P. Bouchaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 059701 (2003), also cond-mat/0209165, on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097201 (2002), also cond-mat/0203444