اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدTwelve Ways To Fool The Masses When Giving Parallel-In-Time Results
148
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Getting good speedup -- let alone high parallel efficiency -- for parallel-in-time (PinT) integration examples can be frustratingly difficult. The high complexity and large number of parameters in PinT methods can easily (and unintentionally) lead to numerical experiments that overestimate the algorithms performance. In the tradition of Baileys article Twelve ways to fool the masses when giving performance results on parallel computers, we discuss and demonstrate pitfalls to avoid when evaluating performance of PinT methods. Despite being written in a light-hearted tone, this paper is intended to raise awareness that there are many ways to unintentionally fool yourself and others and that by avoiding these fallacies more meaningful PinT performance results can be obtained.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
The Lorentz equations describe the motion of electrically charged particles in electric and magnetic fields and are used widely in plasma physics. The most popular numerical algorithm for solving them is the Boris method, a variant of the Stormer-Ver
let algorithm. Boris method is phase space volume conserving and simulated particles typically remain near the correct trajectory. However, it is only second order accurate. Therefore, in scenarios where it is not enough to know that a particle stays on the right trajectory but one needs to know where on the trajectory the particle is at a given time, Boris method requires very small time steps to deliver accurate phase information, making it computationally expensive. We derive an improved version of the high-order Boris spectral deferred correction algorithm (Boris-SDC) by adopting a convergence acceleration strategy for second order problems based on the Generalised Minimum Residual (GMRES) method. Our new algorithm is easy to implement as it still relies on the standard Boris method. Like Boris-SDC it can deliver arbitrary order of accuracy through simple changes of runtime parameter but possesses better long-term energy stability. We demonstrate for two examples, a magnetic mirror trap and the Solevev equilibrium, that the new method can deliver better accuracy at lower computational cost compared to the standard Boris method. While our examples are motivated by tracking ions in the magnetic field of a nuclear fusion reactor, the introduced algorithm can potentially deliver similar improvements in efficiency for other applications.
We present a novel approach which aims at high-performance uncertainty quantification for cardiac electrophysiology simulations. Employing the monodomain equation to model the transmembrane potential inside the cardiac cells, we evaluate the effect o
f spatially correlated perturbations of the heart fibers on the statistics of the resulting quantities of interest. Our methodology relies on a close integration of multilevel quadrature methods, parallel iterative solvers and space-time finite element discretizations, allowing for a fully parallelized framework in space, time and stochastics. Extensive numerical studies are presented to evaluate convergence rates and to compare the performance of classical Monte Carlo methods such as standard Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), as well as multilevel strategies, i.e. multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) and multilevel quasi-Monte Carlo (MLQMC) on hierarchies of nested meshes. Finally, we employ a recently suggested variant of the multilevel approach for non-nested meshes to deal with a realistic heart geometry.
It is well known that domain-decomposition-based multiscale mixed methods rely on interface spaces, defined on the skeleton of the decomposition, to connect the solution among the non-overlapping subdomains. Usual spaces, such as polynomial-based one
s, cannot properly represent high-contrast channelized features such as fractures (high permeability) and barriers (low permeability) for flows in heterogeneous porous media. We propose here new interface spaces, which are based on physics, to deal with permeability fields in the simultaneous presence of fractures and barriers, accommodated respectively, by the pressure and flux spaces. Existing multiscale methods based on mixed formulations can take advantage of the proposed interface spaces, however, in order to present and test our results, we use the newly developed Multiscale Robin Coupled Method (MRCM) [Guiraldello, et al., J. Comput. Phys., 355 (2018) pp. 1-21], which generalizes most well-known multiscale mixed methods, and allows for the independent choice of the pressure and flux interface spaces. An adaptive version of the MRCM [Rocha, et al., J. Comput. Phys., 409 (2020), 109316] is considered that automatically selects the physics-based pressure space for fractured structures and the physics-based flux space for regions with barriers, resulting in a procedure with unprecedented accuracy. The features of the proposed approach are investigated through several numerical simulations of single-phase and two-phase flows, in different heterogeneous porous media. The adaptive MRCM combined with the interface spaces based on physics provides promising results for challenging problems with the simultaneous presence of fractures and barriers.
Notched components are commonly used in engineering structures, where stress concentration may easily lead to crack initiation and development. The main goal of this work is to develop a simple numerical method to predict the structural strength and
crack-growth-path of U-notched specimens made of brittle materials. For this purpose, the Fragile Points Method (FPM), as previously proposed by the authors, has been augmented by an interface damage model at the interfaces of the FPM domains, to simulate crack initiation and development. The formulations of FPM are based on a discontinuous Galerkin weak form where point-based piece-wise-continuous polynomial test and trial functions are used instead of element-based basis functions. In this work, the numerical fluxes introduced across interior interfaces between subdomains are postulated as the tractions acting on the interface derived from an interface damage model. The interface damage is triggered when the numerical flux reaches the interface strength, and the process of crack-surface separation is governed by the fracture energy. In this way, arbitrary crack initiation and propagation can be naturally simulated without the need for knowing the fracture-patch before-hand. Additionally, a small penalty parameter is sufficient to enforce the weak-form continuity condition before damage initiation, without causing problems such as artificial compliance and numerical ill-conditioning. As validations, the proposed FPM method with the interface damage model is used to predict the structural strength and crack-development from U-notched structures made of brittle materials, which is useful but challenging in engineering structural design practices.
In this paper, a new finite element (FE) model using ABAQUS software was developed to investigate the compressive behavior of Concrete-Filled Steel Circular-Tube (CFSCT) columns. Experimental studies indicated that the confinement offered by the circ
ular steel tube in a CFSCT column increased both the strength and ductility of the filled concrete. Base on the database of 663 test results CFSCT columns under axial compression are collected from the available literature, a formula to determine the lateral confining pressures on concrete. Concrete-Damaged Plasticity Model (CDPM) and parameters are available in ABAQUS are used in the analysis. From results analysis, a proposed formula for predicting ultimate load by determining intensification and diminution for concrete and steel. The proposed formula is then compared with the FE model, the previous study, and the design code current in strength prediction of CFSCT columns under compression. The comparative result shows that the FE model, the proposed formula is more stable and accurate than the previous study and current standards when using material normal or high strength.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
