اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدProblems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measures
129
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Game-theoretic formulations of feature importance have become popular as a way to explain machine learning models. These methods define a cooperative game between the features of a model and distribute influence among these input elements using some form of the games unique Shapley values. Justification for these methods rests on two pillars: their desirable mathematical properties, and their applicability to specific motivations for explanations. We show that mathematical problems arise when Shapley values are used for feature importance and that the solutions to mitigate these necessarily induce further complexity, such as the need for causal reasoning. We also draw on additional literature to argue that Shapley values do not provide explanations which suit human-centric goals of explainability.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
For feature selection and related problems, we introduce the notion of classification game, a cooperative game, with features as players and hinge loss based characteristic function and relate a features contribution to Shapley value based error appo
rtioning (SVEA) of total training error. Our major contribution is ($star$) to show that for any dataset the threshold 0 on SVEA value identifies feature subset whose joint interactions for label prediction is significant or those features that span a subspace where the data is predominantly lying. In addition, our scheme ($star$) identifies the features on which Bayes classifier doesnt depend but any surrogate loss function based finite sample classifier does; this contributes to the excess $0$-$1$ risk of such a classifier, ($star$) estimates unknown true hinge risk of a feature, and ($star$) relate the stability property of an allocation and negative valued SVEA by designing the analogue of core of classification game. Due to Shapley values computationally expensive nature, we build on a known Monte Carlo based approximation algorithm that computes characteristic function (Linear Programs) only when needed. We address the potential sample bias problem in feature selection by providing interval estimates for SVEA values obtained from multiple sub-samples. We illustrate all the above aspects on various synthetic and real datasets and show that our scheme achieves better results than existing recursive feature elimination technique and ReliefF in most cases. Our theoretically grounded classification game in terms of well defined characteristic function offers interpretability (which we formalize in terms of final task) and explainability of our framework, including identification of important features.
We establish a new connection between value and policy based reinforcement learning (RL) based on a relationship between softmax temporal value consistency and policy optimality under entropy regularization. Specifically, we show that softmax consist
ent action values correspond to optimal entropy regularized policy probabilities along any action sequence, regardless of provenance. From this observation, we develop a new RL algorithm, Path Consistency Learning (PCL), that minimizes a notion of soft consistency error along multi-step action sequences extracted from both on- and off-policy traces. We examine the behavior of PCL in different scenarios and show that PCL can be interpreted as generalizing both actor-critic and Q-learning algorithms. We subsequently deepen the relationship by showing how a single model can be used to represent both a policy and the corresponding softmax state values, eliminating the need for a separate critic. The experimental evaluation demonstrates that PCL significantly outperforms strong actor-critic and Q-learning baselines across several benchmarks.
In this paper we propose a novel method that provides contrastive explanations justifying the classification of an input by a black box classifier such as a deep neural network. Given an input we find what should be %necessarily and minimally and suf
ficiently present (viz. important object pixels in an image) to justify its classification and analogously what should be minimally and necessarily emph{absent} (viz. certain background pixels). We argue that such explanations are natural for humans and are used commonly in domains such as health care and criminology. What is minimally but critically emph{absent} is an important part of an explanation, which to the best of our knowledge, has not been explicitly identified by current explanation methods that explain predictions of neural networks. We validate our approach on three real datasets obtained from diverse domains; namely, a handwritten digits dataset MNIST, a large procurement fraud dataset and a brain activity strength dataset. In all three cases, we witness the power of our approach in generating precise explanations that are also easy for human experts to understand and evaluate.
Game-theoretic attribution techniques based on Shapley values are used extensively to interpret black-box machine learning models, but their exact calculation is generally NP-hard, requiring approximation methods for non-trivial models. As the comput
ation of Shapley values can be expressed as a summation over a set of permutations, a common approach is to sample a subset of these permutations for approximation. Unfortunately, standard Monte Carlo sampling methods can exhibit slow convergence, and more sophisticated quasi Monte Carlo methods are not well defined on the space of permutations. To address this, we investigate new approaches based on two classes of approximation methods and compare them empirically. First, we demonstrate quadrature techniques in a RKHS containing functions of permutations, using the Mallows kernel to obtain explicit convergence rates of $O(1/n)$, improving on $O(1/sqrt{n})$ for plain Monte Carlo. The RKHS perspective also leads to quasi Monte Carlo type error bounds, with a tractable discrepancy measure defined on permutations. Second, we exploit connections between the hypersphere $mathbb{S}^{d-2}$ and permutations to create practical algorithms for generating permutation samples with good properties. Experiments show the above techniques provide significant improvements for Shapley value estimates over existing methods, converging to a smaller RMSE in the same number of model evaluations.
Shapley values are one of the main tools used to explain predictions of tree ensemble models. The main alternative to Shapley values are Banzhaf values that have not been understood equally well. In this paper we make a step towards filling this gap,
providing both experimental and theoretical comparison of these model explanation methods. Surprisingly, we show that Banzhaf values offer several advantages over Shapley values while providing essentially the same explanations. We verify that Banzhaf values: (1) have a more intuitive interpretation, (2) allow for more efficient algorithms, and (3) are much more numerically robust. We provide an experimental evaluation of these theses. In particular, we show that on real world instances. Additionally, from a theoretical perspective we provide new and improved algorithm computing the same Shapley value based explanations as the algorithm of Lundberg et al. [Nat. Mach. Intell. 2020]. Our algorithm runs in $O(TLD+n)$ time, whereas the previous algorithm had $O(TLD^2+n)$ running time bound. Here, $T$ is the number of trees, $L$ is the maximum number of leaves in a tree, and $D$ denotes the maximum depth of a tree in the ensemble. Using the computational techniques developed for Shapley values we deliver an optimal $O(TL+n)$ time algorithm for computing Banzhaf values based explanations. In our experiments these algorithms give running times smaller even by an order of magnitude.
الأسئلة المقترحة
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
