ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Cazorla et al. [preceding comment] criticize our recent results on the high-PT phase diagram of CaF2 (Phys. Rev. B 95, 054118 (2017)). According to our analysis, Cazorla et al. have not converged their calculations with respect to simulation cell size, undermining the comments conclusions about both the high-T behaviour of the P-62m-CaF2 polymorph, and the use of the QHA in our work. As such, we take this opportunity to emphasise the importance of correctly converging molecular dynamics simulations to avoid finite-size errors. We compare our quasiharmonic phase diagram for CaF2 with currently available experimental data, and find it to be entirely consistent and in qualitative agreement with such data. Our prediction of a superionic phase transition in P-62m-CaF2 (made on the basis of the QHA) is shown to be accurate, and we argue that simple descriptors, such as phonon frequencies, can offer valuable insight and predictive power concerning superionic behaviour.
We investigate the high-pressure behaviour of beryllium, magnesium and calcium difluorides using ab initio random structure searching and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, over the pressure range 0-70 GPa. Beryllium fluoride exhibits exte
The issues raised in the comment by T.A. Manz are addressed through the presentation of calculated atomic charges for NaF, NaCl, MgO, SrTiO$_3$ and La$_2$Ce$_2$O$_7$, using our previously presented method for calculating Hirshfeld-I charges in Solids
BaFe2Se3 is a potential superconductor material exhibiting transition at 11 K and ambient pressure. Here we extended the structural and performed electrical resistivity measurements on this compound up to 51 GPa and 20 GPa, respectively, in order to
A study of high pressure solid Te was carried out at room temperature using Raman spectroscopy and Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. The analysis of the P-dependence of the experi- mental phonon spectrum reveals the occurrence of phase tr
This Comment points out a number of errors in the recent paper by Zarechnaya, Dubrovinskaia, Dubrovinsky, et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 185501 (2009)). Results and conclusions presented by Zarechnaya et al. (2009) are either incorrect or have been presented before.