اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدWhat is turbulence, what is fossil turbulence, and which ways do they cascade?
125
0
0.0
(
0
)
تأليف
Carl H. Gibson
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Turbulence is defined as an eddy-like state of fluid motion where the inertial-vortex forces of the eddies are larger than any other forces that tend to damp the eddies out. By this definition, turbulence always cascades from small scales (where the vorticity is created) to larger scales (where other forces dominate and the turbulence fossilizes). Fossil turbulence is any perturbation in a hydrophysical field produced by turbulence that persists after the fluid is no longer turbulent at the scale of the perturbation. Fossil turbulence patterns and fossil turbulence waves preserve and propagate information about previous turbulence to larger and smaller length scales. Big bang fossil turbulence patterns are identified in anisotropies of temperature detected by space telescopes in the cosmic microwave background. Direct numerical simulations of stratified shear flows and wakes show that turbulence and fossil turbulence interactions are recognizable and persistent.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Turbulence is defined as an eddy-like state of fluid motion where the inertial-vortex forces of the eddies are larger than all the other forces that tend to damp the eddies out. Fossil turbulence is a perturbation produced by turbulence that persists
after the fluid ceases to be turbulent at the scale of the perturbation. Because vorticity is produced at small scales, turbulence must cascade from small scales to large, providing a consistent physical basis for Kolmogorovian universal similarity laws. Oceanic and astrophysical mixing and diffusion are dominated by fossil turbulence and fossil turbulent waves. Observations from space telescopes show turbulence and vorticity existed in the beginning of the universe and that their fossils persist. Fossils of big bang turbulence include spin and the dark matter of galaxies: clumps of ~ 10^12 frozen hydrogen planets that make globular star clusters as seen by infrared and microwave space telescopes. When the planets were hot gas, they hosted the formation of life in a cosmic soup of hot-water oceans as they merged to form the first stars and chemicals. Because spontaneous life formation according to the standard cosmological model is virtually impossible, the existence of life falsifies the standard cosmological model.
Many new models of wave turbulence -- frozen, mesoscopic, laminated, decaying, sand-pile, etc. -- have been developed in the last decade aiming to solve problems seemingly not solvable in the framework of the existing wave turbulence theory (WTT). In
this Letter we show that very often the reason of these discrepancies is that some necessary conditions of the WTT are not satisfied: initial energy distribution is not according to the assumptions of the theory; nonlinearity is not small enough; duration of an experiment is not sufficient to observe kinetic time scale; etc. Two alternative models are briefly presented which can be used to interpret experimental data, both giving predictions at the dynamical time scale: a) a dynamical energy cascade, for systems with narrow initial excitation and weak and moderate nonlinearity, and b) an effective evolution equation, for systems with distributed initial state and small nonlinearity.
Temperature, the central concept of thermal physics, is one of the most frequently employed physical quantities in common practice. Even though the operative methods of the temperature measurement are described in detail in various practical instruct
ions and textbooks, the rigorous treatment of this concept is almost lacking in the current literature. As a result, the answer to a simple question of what the temperature is is by no means trivial and unambiguous. There is especially an appreciable gap between the temperature as introduced in the frame of statistical theory and the only experimentally observable quantity related to this concept, phenomenological temperature. Just the logical and epistemological analysis of the present concept of phenomenological temperature is the kernel of the contribution.
147 -
Pascal Fries Ernst Strungmannn Institute for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society
2021
The field of in-vivo neurophysiology currently uses statistical standards that are based on tradition rather than formal analysis. Typically, data from two (or few) animals are pooled for one statistical test, or a significant test in a first animal
is replicated in one (or few) further animals. The use of more than one animal is widely believed to allow an inference on the population. Here, we explain that a useful inference on the population would require larger numbers and a different statistical approach. The field should consider to perform studies at that standard, potentially through coordinated multi-center efforts, for selected questions of exceptional importance. Yet, for many questions, this is ethically and/or economically not justifiable. We explain why in those studies with two (or few) animals, any useful inference is limited to the sample of investigated animals, irrespective of whether it is based on few animals, two animals or a single animal.
In a recent paper we presented evidence for the occurence of Leray-like singularities with positive Sedov-Taylor exponent $alpha$ in turbulent flows recorded in Modanes wind tunnel, by looking at simultaneous acceleration and velocity records. Here w
e use another tool which allows to get other informations on the dynamics of turbulent bursts. We compare the structure functions for velocity and acceleration in the same turbulent flows. This shows the possible contribution of other types of self-similar solutions because this new study shows that statistics is seemingly dominated by singularities with small positive or even negative values of the exponent $alpha$, that corresponds to weakly singular solutions with singular acceleration, and regular velocity. We present several reasons explaining that the exponent $alpha$ derived from the structure functions curves, may look to be negative.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
